On The State Interventionism In The Macro - Economic Management Thought In Ancient China

The market-based reform that China carries on is a kind of progressive reform, is all different to radical reform that carries on with the Soviet Union and eastern Europe to some extent on the route and way. Practice has proved, the progressive market-based reform that China chooses is correct, the radical reform which the Soviet Union and eastern Europe chose, the treatment is proved wrong by the fact that suffer from shock in other words. While its wrong reason lies in the country breaks the already existing planning system rapidly, but have no idea to set up perfect market economy in a short time , cause the vacuum on a kind of system. Though the evolutionary reform of China makes China' s economy , politics avoid the violent shock, but an unavoidable one is that this kind of reform way must determine China will be in transition period during very long period , two kinds of economy of planned economy and market economy coexist for a long time, rub and the conflict will be unavoidable , the market will fall into a kind of disordered state because of all sorts of friction and conflict . China economic transition of different contradictions existence put forward higher macro adjustments and controls in government of period than demand under developed market economy, analyse and study ancient macroeconomy thought not to get up important reference meaning very to our country present market-based reform and government macro adjustments and controls under background this.Ancient China have two kind of macro adjustments and controls, one is "shanyin theory " represented by Si Ma Qian, similar to the liberalism of today, the country does not do too much interference to economy, another kind is interfere doctrine for country, represented with Guan Zhong, Sang Hong Tang, Liu Yan , etc. This text analyses mainly the doctrine of the countryinterfering in China' s ancient economic historiography, and ending in article analyse their briefly with western founder Keynes of macroeconomics. Except Guan Zhong, Sang Hong Tang, Liu Yan, a group of remarkable economic thinker and reformer have emerged at the history in china, such as Wang Anshi in Northern Song Dynasty, Zhang Juzheng in the Ming Dynasty. But Guan Zhong, Sang Hong Tang, Liu Yan three people no matter from great thought frame , all in economic practice that interfere the doctrine on behalf of the ancient country of China, so the activity that this text analyses the economic thoughts of the above three people and their practice mainly. The economic history circle has already made the remarkable achievement in the study on these three, but their research is generally comparatively decentralized , do not assemble these three together to study . This text on the basis of the achievements that a great deal of the older generations teacher study , attempt to concentrate on ancient national theory content and realistic practice of intervention doctrine, analyse the logic connection between the three, thus can show an intact theoretical system , this is theory meaning of this text.The writing of this text is divided into five major parts altogether. First part is a preamble, introduce the background and meaning of the selected title , relevant documents survey mainly, thinking of research and method , the innovation of the thesis . Second part Mainly introduces economic thought of Guan Zhong. the third part introduces the financial economic reform of Sang Hongyang of Western Han Dynasty mainly and points out it is correlated with Guan Zhong by the successions and development of thought. The fourth part details with Liu Yan' s reforms, carried on to solve the financial crisis at that time, points out it with developing and Liu Yan 's own remarkable management ability of commodity economy, pay attention to private enthusiasm more and more among economic activity, itbeing Liu Yan most heavy characteristic, mark the transition of China' s ancient industrial and commercial management mode. The fifth part is a conclusion part, compare the doctrine and Keynes' economics at first, and then has analysed mainly the meaning to the market-based reform and government' s macro adjustments and controls.Famous scholar Mr. Zhao Jing has pointed out, economic thought of ancient times such as China usually regard country and politics for standard instead of regard individual and wealth for standard mostly, so how to analyse as numerous generals' political factor is being rejected , try one' s best to look for one's own law of marcoeconomic management, it is one of the questions that should be paid attention to at the time of the writing of this text. Another difficult question of this text at the same time lie in that it use some modern economic theory to analyse economic thought of ancient times, an unavoidable question is to break away from the historical condition at that time unconsciously, excessive judging by today is ancient, biased to some extent, this is a question that should be paid attention to too.