Research On LiuZi

People today on the LiuZi of discussion, a few are all without exceptionLiu xie was not the Liu zhou such an either-or understanding of the leading, and then either get a book LiuZi out of the reveal, the life experience of the trance of quiet subtle messages to and Liu xie, Liu zhou life of two-phase pull together; or is from the thinking, language, style, etc., take the LiuZi in Liu xie to the same book, Wen Xin Diao Long compared with, if found to have discord discrepancies and will be denied, according to Liu xie of the day or Liu. This either-or understanding, in fact, is a Chinese saying that the second election by a narrow processing. In this regard, commentators have made a great reflection of historical consciousness, and that the LiuZi of identified as Anonymous, is the most appropriate treatment. However, today's discussion, LiuZi On the problem of scholars, not only did not realize it, the argument in the specific methods, they made the wrong analogy pull together, can be described as a mistake. Research papers in almost three years, this method is still unaware of the argument and reflection, can not help but regrettable. On LiuZi, the Time of its aesthetics discussion, but also problematic. The former, showing the lack of evidence and argument strength are not consciously made by the results of backstepping cause of the error; the latter, due to the criticism out of context and makes people today seem pointless. Nevertheless, scholars in the LiuZi Wen school note, the continued lack of new results come out.Relative to the discussion of the bustling, the LiuZi thought of the research appears to be deserted lot. This is obviously, LiuZi of the discussion has a lot. Why? It is a discussion of the scholars, LiuZi in questions of authorship, to underlie Liu zhou, Liu xie two, making the discussion more and more irrelevant, so that almost everyone forgot to come back to seriously look at LiuZi,hidden in the end this book, what kind of thinking. That, however, is the LiuZi of the key. The LiuZi a little study, we can easily find, LiuZi of both the internal needs of self-cultivation, more rule the world external to pursue. For the ancient so-called "Three Immortality", which he valued only the virtue, meritorious. Not only that, he even thought that if a person is abstinence, and not make contributions for the country, it was not worthy of esteem and learning to future generations. Can be seen between the Leader and meritorious service, he was special emphasis on merit. Meanwhile, the book also talks about fate, on the next travel, that fortune, regulation remonstrance ruler who, accused of customs, which is another show of the secular side. This is from a positive study, LiuZi received knowledge. However, if we go from a negative study, LiuZi, on this issue there may be new findings. LiuZi only the value of virtue, merit, that only these two points to make it immortal. That is, he does not think you can make it immortal Li-yen, LiuZi in writing this book, the purpose is not to write books that. In fact, LiuZi is of no use as the world, self-injury do not case to make, this book has to understand explanation.In fact, since Ming and Qing dynasties, the angle of creation from ode to view or, positive LiuZi "this book, the reading it, and saw many previous evolutionist, just as zishu view. Also fully proved this point. A literary work is by originally as literature works by people see, that later from the literary perspective to decipher, this itself is a very meaningful literary events. And the function of literature history, is this a literary events to record and know the change, general. Only this full of historical consciousness, the writing is not intereing is true literature writing.Zishu's creation, the purpose is nothing but say a truth or express some concepts, i.e., it is rather than argue lyric. Meanwhile, since the end of the western han dynasty, the style has gradually PianLi, ethos and the six dynasties and the creation of cifu two-page essay, without exception, so. So, the LiuZi "the book of PianLi displayed by the creation of the tendency, it is undoubtedly a style under the influence of the era of specific performance. That is to say, to the PaiOu web site, makes articles shuo theory in the meanwhile, eloquence reasoning literary also does not break in 2001. Meanwhile, in the narrative of change and after the use of metaphor and also further strengthened the readability and interesting.