Font Size: a A A

The Effects Of Eomtion,Emotion Regulation On Metamemory Moni-toring

Posted on:2013-02-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:T T WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2215330374462402Subject:Applied Psychology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Metamemory monitoring is an individual understanding and judgment of the extent of the object memory, and judgment of learning is the classic paradigm of metamemory monitoring.Metamemory monitoring is affected by many factors, emotion is an important individual variable. The researches on the relationship among emotion, emotion regulation and cognition have been hotly issues, but which concentrated to explore the emotion and strategies of regulation on the object-level cognitive, the impact of meta-level cognitive rarely involved, so the mechanisms of emotion and emotion regulation strategies impacting on the metamemory monitoring are not clear.The experimental approach to reveal the emotion, emotion regulation how to impact on metamemory monitoring. Experiment1investigated emotions of different valences (positive, neutral and negative) how to impact on metamemory monitoring by within-subjects design; Experiment2investigated the subliminal emotion (positive, neutral and negative) how to impact on metamemory monitoring by within-subjects design; comprehensiving results of experiment1and experimen2to compare the difference of emotional and subliminal emotional impact on metamemory monitoring; In Experiment3, the method was on the basis of previous experiments control the strategies of emotion regulation only through the instructions, combined with the questionnaire, the subjects were grouped, by3X4mixed two factorial design to examine the four emotion regulation strategies of reappraisal, rumination, expressive revealing and expressive suppression how to impact on metamemory monitoring.The results showed that:(1) Different emotions impacted on metamemory monitoring:compared with neutral emotion, positive emotion significantly improve magnitude of JoL, negative emotion significantly reduce the magnitude of JoL; different emotions on accuracy of JoL was not significant.(2) Subliminal emotions of different styles impacted on metamemory monitoring:compared with subliminal neutral emotion, the subliminal positive emotion, subliminal negative emotion significantly improve the magnitude of JoL, but did not improve the accuracy of JoL.(3) There were different mechanisms of subliminal emotion and supraliminal emotion impact on metamemory monitoring:mainly subliminal negative emotions significantly improve the magnitude of JoL, while negative emotions significantly reduce the magnitude of JoL.(4) In the positive emotional state,the impact of different emotion regulation strategies on the metamemory monitoring is different:reappraisal and expressive revealing of the magnitude of JoL were higher than the rumination and expressive supperession; while the accuracy was contrast.(5) In the negative emotional state, the impact of different emotion regulation strategies on the metamemory monitoring is different:rumination of the magnitude of JoL had the highest level, followed by the expressive supperession, reappraisal and expressive revealing of minimum; the antecedent-focused emotion regulation and expressive revealing are higher than expressive supperession of the accuracy of JoL.
Keywords/Search Tags:Metamemory monitoring, Judgment of Learning, Emotion, Subliminal emotion, Emotion regulation, Strategies of emotion regulation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items