Sino-US Trade In Intellectual Property Protection

Since the reform and opening up,trade between China and the U.S. is becoming more frequent, especially in China on the U.S. side of science and technology of high precision and high-tech products import an increasing proportion of total trade,in addition to a late start in China's IP laws,legislation,judicial,law enforcement,etc,there are still some problems,resulting in intellectual property disputes between the Sino-US trade has become the crux of the most prominent. Although China on Sino-US trade in intellectual property protection,has from the legislative,judicial and law enforcement and other aspects of a series of improvements and additions,but the status of U.S. intellectual property protection in China is increasing discontent constantly through a variety of way to put pressure on China,including the frequent threat of trade sanctions,and finally at the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body proceedings,giving rise to the first WTO case of Sino-US intellectual property rights. So how better to solve the author only from the Sino-US trade in the perspective of intellectual property disputes,for our country to better Sino-US trade made between the protection of intellectual property can refer to sexual comments. This article only the first case of Sino-US intellectual property rights as the main clues to solve international disputes from the perspective of international intellectual property law,in particular the study of Sino-US intellectual property laws,including its production,the development process, as well as between the existing law conflict. Has emerged through the analysis of the causes of Sino-US IPR disputes, after the result,substance,etc.,reading about the "TRIPS Agreement" and the interpretation and application of the two existing laws and relevant international treaties,with bilateral political,economic and other factors, projections of future bilateral trade disputes that may arise to further the field,and the Solution,built on the law came to the conclusion Solutions.