Comparative Research Of Real Estate Control Law

Housing reform in China since 1998,in the process of continuous exploration ,the regulation of the real estate market has been effected ,but they did not like the foreign countries of market economy can effectively control the real estate market ,making the "living Ownership" ,protect the fundamental rights of the residents .The reason is not in compliance, based on market mechanisms, play government macro-control means; the administration of excessive government intervention, Our country's housing problem has not been solved, failed to achieve effective supply situation.This article first sort out and analyze real estate development and reform in China since the introduction of a series of regulatory policies; Then with the advanced market economies, regulatory law systems are compared. The same is the use of land management, finance, taxation, housing and other macro-control security system means, but in the end the effect was different.United States based on the effective supply of real estate also proposed the Idea of sustainable development of land, this is among China's current regulatory policies are never mentioned, Should be worthy of our study and emulate. Japan as a densely populated country was able to effectively control their housing well, is worth thinking; Japan experienced a real estate bubble crisis, failed to recover from decades; Although not yet out of the downturn in real estate. However, Local nationals' living standards, living environment and the level of development of the real estate industry, but in the status of the world's advanced ,This fact also We should get to the bottom and learning. Similarly, Singapore is a densely populated country, Singapore government to solve its domestic housing problems, Housing and Development Board and the Central Provident Fund Board was established; Central Provident Fund Board set aside sufficient funds in advance to provided for members to extract, all remaining funds to buy government bonds, provide adequate funding ensure that the government of the Housing and Development Board's financial support, ensure that its national "Home Ownership".In comparison with these countries, We can see,the more we follow the market economy mechanism based on regulation, the better. Therefore, combine the situation of our country and the foreign advanced experience, this article contains the housing security system and for the tax system both macro-control method to improve the real estate and construction.