A Study Of The Ethical Value Of Euthanasia

With the development of technology, people are also deepening their understanding of life and death. People's attitudes towards life and death are also changing. As a way and an attitude towards life and death, euthanasia will inevitably become an unavoidable topic for people. There were discussions on euthanasia in China long long ago, but there have been large differences. The focus is whether to promote the legalization of euthanasia. The controversies triggered by the analysis of euthanasia are mainly because most people demonstrate only from one aspect of the issue of euthanasia and they never or seldom systematically recognize the essence of euthanasia. This paper is divided into six parts, and has explored the ethical value of euthanasia.The first chapter discusses the purposes of study, the significance of study, the methods of study and the possible innovations. The paper argues that heated discussions on euthanasia in the field of ethics are due to the supporters' and the opponents' disagreements and their endless arguments. It is of some theoretical and practical value to solve the challenges and confusion of euthanasia by sorting out and identifying previous theories and practices and summarizing and studying its most basic ethical concepts and moral essenceThe second chapter discusses the definition of euthanasia its historical evolution, the first major analysis of euthanasia, the definition and characteristics; then the classification of the conduct of euthanasia, euthanasia can be divided into: active euthanasia and passive euthanasia; voluntary euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia ; direct euthanasia and indirect euthanasia, etc.; Finally, the issue of euthanasia is the emergence and development of a historical process, and only trace the history of euthanasia, clarify its development context in order to lay the foundation for further research, analysis of ancient and modern history of euthanasia and the modern Western knowledge and practice of euthanasia and the institutionalization of the process.In the Third chapter, discusses the status of euthanasia in China and the confusion, first of all discusses the status of euthanasia in China, the article that China so far has not addressed the issue of euthanasia legislation. But in reality, passive euthanasia, the situation is more universal. Secondly, China's current controversy surrounding euthanasia constant mainly as follows: the attribution of the right to life of the debates, the purpose of the debates the value of life, medical ethics of the controversy, the possibility of harmful consequences of euthanasia debates. Finally, the analysis of the contradictions in the moral evaluation of euthanasia: Life on the sanctity of theory and quality of life, emotional ism and rationalism of the contradictions, the contradiction between reality and possibility. The existence of these contradictions, makes it in evaluating the euthanasia issue, caught in the dilemma, conflicts both sides are to consider this aspect from the patient arrived at different conclusions. In the Fourth chapter, discussed the issue of euthanasia in a philosophical perspective, the issue of euthanasia in the final analysis is a philosophical issue, it involves philosophical reflection on contemporary medicine and the traditional view of nature, life and values criticism. On the philosophy of medicine is different from the value of nature and human life, the philosophy of understanding of different attitudes to different forms of death will not be the same. In the first section, the article from the human nature and the essence of life start to explore the duality of human differentiation and unification, the object of human life and spirit of unity and contradiction, the timing characteristics of human life. Person's death is the essence of life is the pursuit of the universal human condition, but Yousheng that is dead. Death as the opposite of life is always filled in life among the. In the second content, the analysis of deaths definition and characteristics of the death of objectivity, and thus leads to the meaning of death. The third content from euthanasia is the right to life, euthanasia is a choice of the value of life, euthanasia is a choice of three levels of social justice to analyze the reasonableness of euthanasia.In the Fifth chapter, discusses the ethics of euthanasia and systems to achieve the concept of euthanasia is not only a theoretical problem, but also a practical issue, study the theory of well-being but also to better guide practice. For the problems of euthanasia, combined with the times and social development, set forth a system of ethics and the concept of euthanasia, that is, the changes from the perspective of ethics and euthanasia ethical principles established by starting to explore the concept of euthanasia solution of the problem by the to set up a system to achieve euthanasia.The conclusion that, through articles in the euthanasia argument, euthanasia, in line with our ethical code of ethics, is a human manifestation of transcendence, in line with human nature, is a reasonable choice. In the understanding of euthanasia, to help people adopt the scientific conception of death, increase awareness of quality and value of life, recognizing that euthanasia is a dignified death.In the construction of euthanasia, you can build through the system and mechanisms for the establishment and improvement of the provision of institutional support for the implementation of euthanasia.In the implementation of euthanasia, you can euthanasia legislation to regulate and control the implementation of euthanasia.