| ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the nursing professional students to use suitable for China, concise and easy, objective comprehensive evaluation to protect life humanity quality level of the method. Through the design nursing undergraduate humanity quality teachers he review table and its application, for further training and improving humanism quality of nursing students level for reference.Data sourcesPreliminary test:Random shanxi medical university nursing college of200people since the humanistic quality of the test (including nursing undergraduate students in grade three communication with four grade100, nursing undergraduate students with a grade rise only this second year100people); At the same time, the extraction of nursing director of professional teachers in each grade and a total of nine people of humanistic quality of the teachers he review the test.Formal assessment:(1) shanxi medical university nursing college of communication four-year undergraduate nursing grade three and grade four (end of learning)465, two-year undergraduate students with a grade rise only this care, grade2end of learning)330, two nursing undergraduate explores the schooling for full-time, total795people; Age20～26years old.(2) shanxi medical school of nursing28teachers, all from shanxi medical university nursing college of each grade and the director of nursing professional teachers. All teachers are female, age31-45years old in the majority, teachers were in the15-20assessment3years.MethodsThis study belong to the non-experimental research. In the literature research, and on the basis of the research on the clear theoretical basis and foundation, choose the humanistic quality of the nursing undergraduate students from the table assessment tools, designed the nursing undergraduate humanity quality teachers he review table assessment tools.Through preliminary test, the heavy measured the humanistic quality of the nursing undergraduate students from the list of internal consistency reliability and content validity, structural validity; To the nursing undergraduate humanity quality teachers he review table of expert advice, reliability and validity analysis. Use assessment tools to nursing students of humanistic quality evaluation, nursing students understand the condition of the humanistic quality level, and compares different the classifications and grade between the assessment result, two kinds of assessment tools of test results are the correlation analysis.ResultsNursing undergraduate humanistic quality of the self assessment form Cronbach’s a coefficient is0.881general, evaluation indexes of the dimension Cronbach’s a coefficient between0.805-0.872between; And a half reliability overall coefficient is0.902. Content validity than the overall CVR value is0.816, the dimension of the average CVR value is0.706～1.000; Structural validity of the correlation between the different dimensions in between0.522～0.764, and the overall dimensions and the correlation between the was between0.728～0.818.Nursing undergraduate humanity quality teachers he review table, expert judgment the general effect is good,. Overall Cronbach’s a coefficient is0.845, evaluation indexes of the dimension Cronbach’s a coefficient between0.803～0.839; And a half reliability overall coefficient is0.736. At the same time, the measurement of content validity than the overall CVR value is0.856, the other dimensions CVR value is close to a maximum of the basic CVR1; Factor analysis showed that the extraction of5male factors explain57.85%of the total variance project, the project in the corresponding factor on the load value are>0.30.Nursing undergraduate humanistic quality assessment results show that, the humanities quality from review overall average into77.60±6.80points; The teacher he review score of the overall level is low scored from review, overall average into71.60±7.44points. Undergraduate course grade four and grade three overall score of nursing students are statistically significant differences (P<0.05), four grade overall nursing students scored above grade three and protect life overall score; nursing undergraduates by special upgrade from Grade Two and One overall score of nursing students are statistically significant differences (P<0.05), grade two nursing students scored above grade one general nursing students score. General Two kinds of assessment results of the total score correlation coefficient r=0.768, p<0.01is a significant positive correlation. Two Assessing Form of the dimension correlation coefficients between0.177～0.687, and p<0.01, all were positively correlated.ConclusionHumanistic quality of the two kinds of assessment work all has good reliability and validity. The nursing undergraduate humanity quality teachers he review table of the whole staff process of basic accord with headcount requirements, design structure and theory structure are basically the same. Two kinds of assessment tools to nursing undergraduate of humanistic quality of the evaluation has good correlations, the statistical analysis results have reached statistical acceptable level. The research of the application evaluation method is simple, convenient and feasible, through to the nursing undergraduate assessment and further confirm testing methods is objective, practical, scientific and effective.The idea of this research continue to conduct(1) a little scope the reliability of the experimental results, the lack of representative, reason should expand the scope, the collection is representative of the material, continue to conduct of humanistic quality of the nursing undergraduate research characteristic.(2) enrich and perfect the Assessing Form Settings and further empirical research, development suitable for China’s national conditions of effective nursing students’humanities quality assessment level of tools.(3) the implementation of humanistic quality evaluation should be self assessment of nursing students, teachers, students and he review leading the results of the evaluation, so we will consider increase students of leading research. |
PDF Full Text Request