The Debate Of The Tomb Of Cao Cao In The Perspective Of Sociology Of Scientific Knowledge

Since the1970s, After the Robert King Merton′s paradigm, scientific knowledge sociology(SSK) is in the research field in mainstream position STS of theories. SSK emphasize theconstruction of scientific knowledge is a social process, pay attention to the scientific knowledgeand its social and cultural background, the relationships between aims to show that all the work ofscientific knowledge factors and social combination of factors, is to explain the formation processof scientific knowledge, scientific understanding of the achievements of the social content thatdoes not contain."’ social construction ’is often a metaphor of social action), or the nature of theaction itself (the process and result), it contains is a belief that the nature of things, namely thestructure itself is able to be changed and rearranged. Scientific knowledge sociology willconstructivism theory is introduced to the analysis of the scientific knowledge. SSK scientificdebate is the earliest British SSK scholars study excavation of the research sites, with the studyfield of open, easy to track of science in manufacturing, easy to reveal the social nature of science.By the end of2009,"found that cao cao’s grave" news sparked a debate about thearchaeological science, many scholars, experts involved in the argument. From the time, the caocao’s grave true and false debate can be divided into three stages, reflects the debate to develop. Inthe long term to cao cao’s grave in the debate, to "WeiWuwang" question of the terms isthroughout the debate full story. Cao cao of the tomb of true and false is the essence of theproblem. Cao cao’s grave for authenticity from "to be or not" debate boom last up to academic trueand false debate, and academic problems involved is false and the academic standard and theexperts of academic ethics of social problems. Cao cao’s grave authenticity for scientific fact is not only debate of the theory of including scientific debate. This paper use of SSK accumulated therich of the case study results, Cao cao’s grave in the struggle of the true contents, features and theprocess of debate and analysis, thinking debate its revelation to us. Cao cao’s grave in the disputeof authenticity, can see many of the arguments group. Through the debate over the manifestationof the group, in the interests of scientific knowledge sociology theory explanation to the struggleof the tomb of Cao cao true bogus reason is very simple self-consistent."Interest" as a kind ofexplain source of the scientific knowledge and the extension of the application and the goal of thescientific subject and the relationship between the sociology of cause and instructions, to revealthe social factors on the forming process, the influence of the knowledge. In view ofneo-philosophy of Cao cao’s grave authenticity for bring us deep inspiration. Cao cao’s graveauthenticity reveal already scientific intrinsic value and society value, the unification of the Alsoreflected in science and social interaction and academic exchange process in the disintegration ofpersonal interests, promote the formation of the theoretical results objectively. In science is widelyused in today’s social background, realize the scientists the internalization of the spirittemperament is effectively the self-discipline due. Should as far as possible "purification"scientific research environment, avoid and reduce all kinds of benefits to the negative effect of thescientific activities, let science better service the society.