Study On Deleuze In The Conditions Of Comparative Hoirzon

Study on Deleuze is increasingly becoming more and more prosperous in the field ofdomestic scholars since2004. However, the discussion,which is not matched with theplentiful resources, is limited to the key concepts or thinking from Deleuze. The complicatedstudy between Deleuze and Structuralism, Max, Bergson, Baudrillard and Foucault is alsolimited to the perspective of politics and philosophy insteading of literature. What′s more, themost important literary essays——essays critical and clinical is still empty in the horizon ofdomestic scholars. Deleuze talked with a lager number of philosophers in the early, amongwhich the following ones are particularly worth mentioning, such as Hume, Bergson,Nietzsche, Spinoza. The study cooperated with Guattari is just succeed by the research onhistory of philosophy.The thesis evaluates Deleuze from diverse perspectives with the method of Nietzsche’sperspectivism, which based on the field of comparative horizon by putting Deleuze′s thoughttogether to show its uniqueness. Futhermore, based on the analysis of the situation onDeleuze′study at home and abroad and the history of Deleuze′thought, the thesis elaborates onDeleuze to achieve the target of critical and clinical from various angeles, such as the logic ofproduction on literature and art, image thought and the challenge of modernity. From theabove the presentation, there are five chapters in the thesis followed by〝Deleuze andMax:two types of production logic〞,〝Deleuze and Structuralism: Two approaches ofnarration〞,〝Deleuze and Baudrillard: Two thoughts of image〞,〝Deleuze andFoucault:challenge to modernity〞and〝the literary views of critical and clinical〞.There is no doubt that Deleuze was influenced by Max.Deleuze transferred the theory ofsocial production from Max into the theory of desire production which is viewed as theprocession of Schizophrenia and production. There is various difference between socialproduction and desire production in terms of the production of logic,operation mechanism andcategory. However, they are worked on the basis of actual production. In the same degree,social production is desire production.Deleuze, the key individual from Structuralism to post-Structuralism, praised highlyrhizome narration which is different from the tree narration used by Structuralists. The latteris characterized with uniformity and linearity, while the former is charactered with becoming, multiformity and multi-narration.Bergson played an indispensable role in Deleuze′philosophical thinking and guidedDeleuze into the field of filmic art. Therefore, Deleuze build the filmic philosophy centeredon time-image when he explained Bergson′philosophy of life. The six kinds of image kindand its organizations one another is not equal to the simulacra which lead to〝hyper-reality〞in consumer society. At the same time, the〝different image〞make virtuality to be the part ofreality. Thus Deleuze reunderstood the relationship between reality and non-reality.Deleuze criticize modernity followed by Foucault from the perspective of the arrangementof language right insteading of right, and put the thinking horizon into the control society. Thestudy is substituted for the project of alienation.The quality from philosophers and artists in Deleuze himself always go hand in hand. Afteranalysing the concept of life in detail, Deleuze explained the traditional statement——what isliterature, which is not the free expression of individual feeling, not revolutionary mouthpiece,but a project related to healthy. Thus symptomatic literary criticism is the diagnosis to allkinds of the symptoms of the disease in capitalist society. Furthermore,minor literature notonly involved the inner change of the arrangement of language right, but also the politicalsignificance of literature.