Kant’s Study Of Humanity

Humanity as an old topic, people have launched different debates and writings, may be exactly what human nature is still do not have a fixed view. As human history, the greatest philosopher Immanuel Kant, thinking of their own unique view of human nature. In the past, Kant, people tend to focus only on his three critical study of human nature thought they looked very not pay enough attention to humanity as a fundamental problem, plays an important role in the construction of Kant’s moral philosophy, this dissertation Kant’s Theory of Human Nature Analysis of a rich understanding of Kant’s thought.Humanity in Kant’s view, it is not evil, nor that it is good, because the simple statement that man is good, like Socrates and Rousseau, human nature is inherently good, no one intentionally did that which was evil in the sight of, which will lead to a contradiction, is the plight of the people did evil in practice, people tend to the animal nature of evil, or evil in tendency, is impossible is inherently good, which is entirely based on a priori assumptions on. Pure evil nature of humans, like the Christian original sin and Hobbes evil nature, one is to assume that the people in the innate, a merely above the animal, which will also appear a contradiction, is evil in the There is good and the people in accordance with the compassion can not explanatory, this is still an evil human nature assumptions, and not from the point of view of the person’s own understanding of human nature. Kant from the point of view of the people themselves, both to good deeds original endowment people with increasingly evil tendency goodness of the original endowment, including animal endowments, endowments of human nature and the human personality endowments; increasingly evil tendencies manifested in the human nature of the vulnerability, the human mind is not pure and hearts bad sex. Whether the human heart has a fundamental evil? Kant this was also discussed that the purpose of the human race, there is a fundamental evil, this is not inherently evil, but the people in accordance with their own emotional preferences, contrary to the law of the universality is about to reverse the moral law and malignant. It has rational on the origin, rather than the time on the origin, because the origin of time will result in an endless pursuit, according to the last evil without knowing, rational on the origin is to proceed from the people themselves, the people of the moral law Subversive due. Man as a rational being, in Kant’s view, people have increasingly evil for good, that is, people can use their own rational play a virtue of the power of unconditional moral law be adhered to, so that people increasingly and evil good deeds. Generally speaking, the human nature is to exist in properties between the animals and divinity, the emotional and rational continuum, in the ethical sense, unity is good and evil coexist. This gives Kant’s theory of human nature with great value.Humanity from the point of view of the people themselves description, the emphasis on rational virtue for the role of human nature, the whole reason the human nature. This also makes Kant’s theory of human nature, there are many limitations, ignoring the experience of habit for the role of human nature and belittle the emotional feelings for the cultivation of human nature. And human nature is what exactly is it? Different philosophers, we can sum up the definition of human nature and practice of human nature should be a common attribute, perceptual experience, the quality of emotional culture.