On Antitrust Regulation Of Internet Companies To Abuse Of Market Dominace

With the rapid development of the Internet industry, which dominates the Internet companies into the abuse of market dominance disputes. There’s a lot different from the traditional industries, the Internet industry has prominent ind ustry risk; transactions are less restricted, eternal effects and fast speed of tech nological innovation. Internet industries profound impact on the competitive env ironment and competitive behavior, creating many new problem about the antitr ust laws. Internet enterprise can easily obtain dominant market position by occ upying key technology in a particular field. Such as Microsoft relying Window s systems, Baidu depending its powerful search engine, Apple getting help fro m its platform in the mobile phone software, They all obtain dominant market position in a long term. Therefore, strengthen the regulation of the Internet en terprise to abuse of market dominance behavior is significance for maintaining the normal order of market competition, protecting the economic rapid healthy and stable development.Operation of the Internet while relying on digital, virtual media, but partic ipants in the Internet human environment and the values of the formation is in evitable of impacting by the real word. Our government regulate abusing domi nant market position of Internet enterprise, not only perfecting the relevant pro visions of the Antitrust regulation, marking it adapts the needs of the modern I nternet enterprise development, but also guiding and regulating the value of Int ernet enterprise. Develop scientific and rational and effective policy of antimon opoly law. Propose antitrust interventions and elaborate the key issues of Intern et enterprise abusing the dominant market position, combined with the Internet enterprise development, perfecting of relevant provisions, making them more op erational and focused.Analysis China’s regulation of Internet enterprise abusing the legal status o f the dominant market position, and outline the legislation and law enforcement practice of the United States, and France, and Germany, and Japan, and the i nternational organizations. By comparing the analysis pointed out that the defici encies in the existing legal system in China and the advanced foreign experien ce for reference. Make recommendations for improvement of controlling China’ s Internet enterprise abusing of the dominant market position, improve the relat ed entities the legal system, perfect of anti-monopoly law extraterritorial rule, e stablish a scientific system of responsibility system, attach importance to anti-m onopoly law and other relevant laws, Increase the market superiority of the sta ndard, strengthen the oversight role of industry associations. Explore with Chin ese characteristics and in accordance with the law of the Internet enterprise de velop policy and management systrm.