The Sduty Of "Jiaozhao" In Ming Dynasty

"Jiaozhao" overstepped the use of the emperor of power related to the history books of the Ming Dynasty, many records on Jiaozhao ". In this paper, based on the Ming shi-lu, the "History of Ming Dynasty", the " Annals of the history of Ming " three historical the documented "Jiaozhao "to inspect. The findings of the study, the literature Jiaozhao "can be roughly divided into three:First, the non-existent" Jiaozhao. Was built Emperor "Jiaozhao,’ for example, such "Jiaozhao recorded princes, Huang Sun won the throne through improper channels, tampering with historical facts fabricated from, the purpose is to affirm the legitimacy of the throne. Second doubtful Jiaozhao. Such a "Jiaozhao" different, divergent views recorded in the various history books. Feng Bow Jang "Jiaozhao," for example, this statement is found as early as high arch "written by his sick bed last words. High arch to fail in the struggle with Feng Bow, he was demoted back to the membership, and his book is written Feng Bow Jang "Jiaozhao," one may be doped with personal matters, this statement is not consistent with the records of the Ming Dynasty, but adopted by later historians. Hidden behind this Jiaozhao saying, Gao Gong and Feng Bow struggle, more checks and balances of power between the Cabinet and the Sili Jian. Third emperor acquiescence Jiaozhao. On the surface, these "Jiaozhao" eunuch interference in domestic affairs by virtue of the emperor trust monopolize power generated inside, leading to the constraints of the emperor action civil officials for the emperor’s expectations of a noble and wise monarch, the Emperor disgruntled, to borrow the hands of the eunuch on courtier relegation and inhibition. Later historians taboo for the emperor and the edict issued in the form of the aims writing technique to write "Jiaozhao fact these" Jiaozhao "is basically the acquiescence of the Emperor issued.