Empirical Study Of Administrative Law Enforcement Mode And Related Factors Of The China Securities Regulatory Commission

In the predecessors’ research, more over the securities regulatory system and the nature of the securities law of macroscopic have done, and in public comments to the CSRC it is abuse, lacking of rationality.Stand in the angle of the rule of law, whether securities may be defined as an administrative agency, or a public organization, will not affect China’s securities market along the path of the rule by law, because the rule of law is "let the power run under the law". This paper emphatically studies the CSRC pattern of administrative law enforcement. Its meaning is to clarify the blind spot of the public thinking, with the fact that the CSRC in the proceeding of the rule of law in China’s securities market what has been done, and provides the basis for further study.This article revolves around the core concept of "administrative law enforcement pattern " in the first chapter and introduces the related concepts and basic theory; the accumulated administrative penalties of the CSRC sampling from2001to2012is described as a result in the second chapter; the third chapter, with legal theory, is on administrative type, related organizational factors and legal factors, document changes, etc.