The Study Of Zhang Pu’s Eight-part Essays Edited

Zhang pu was the famous leader of Fushe(复社), social activist, scholar and writer of late Ming Dynasty Zhang Pu is a famous leader in late Ming dynasty after club, social activists, scholars and writers. As a scholar and writer, Zhang Pu had written numerous rich, classics, history, son, have dabbled in various areas, according to historical records, his writings amounted to more than hundreds kinds, more than three thousand volumes. Zhang Pu short life achievements, not just to academic works, in fact, he devoted himself to eight-part essays edited and spent most of his life.This article is divided into three parts. The first part of Zhang Pu family background and connections (especially editorial activities centered) comb, points out that Zhang Pu enthusiasm for eight-part essays edited and activities and their family environment have close ties and his daily communication. The second part of Zhang Pu and its fellow eight-part essays edited a verification activities. In eight-part essays writing, Zhang Pu argues that ancient classics, so in carrying out his eight-part essays edited and social activities, they study the five classics, and as a starting point, organization and leadership activities of his fellow for teachers. Through the compilation of outstanding teachers to choose, they get the fame, improve the popularity. But Zhang Pu in see the scholars only indulged in by reciting districting good especially to choose for fame instead of the present situation of the reading book, he use eight-part essays edited to save the manners and improve the status of the Confucian classics. Third part comb Zhang Pu and Ai Nanying debate about eight-part essays edited. Zhang Pu and Ai Nanying are dynamic when all teachers, in the face of the eight-part essay writing to choose, to choose article level the present situation of the good and bad are intermingled, Ai Nanying and Zhang Pu mean to change this situation, all want to through the eight-part essays edited and activities to promote their own selection, just on the selection of specific content and standards produced controversy because of the differences.