Revolution And Class,Class:Land Reform In The Rural Social Change Research(1949-1952)

1949-1952year land reform after the founding of new China, the Communist Party of China in order to win the people to continue to support and is an important revolution. The land reform and the previous difference is that, before the founding of the land reform is to mobilize the masses involved in the revolution, to complete the tasks of the new democratic revolution, and establish their own regime, and the land reform is the Communist Party of China established its own regime as the background, with a strong political power force support, with a mass movement and the class struggle as the main way to consolidate power, realize the whole society political infiltration, control and on the social transformation of another revolution. The early years of the Republic, the land reform and the suppression of counter-revolutionaries, and tied for the three campaign, the party in power, did not stop the pace of revolution. The land reform is the movement of the revolution, it not only makes the CPC in rural areas has made farmers continue to support, but also through land reform broke the Chinese rural traditional class, social structure, reconstruction of the new social class relation, to reconstruct the national grassroots regime. The Communist Party of China rural society on restructuring and transformation to produced the change of essential sex, as a revolutionary home countryside each class, political, economic, ideological, attitude changes too. The land-reform in different classes, strata and political identity, social status change, change of mind and the state government’s reconstruction as well as the state power of village cadres and struggle for the object, to participate in interactive forces as the breakthrough point, taking Henan County as a case study, reproduction and in the early days of the revolution background mall County Rural Social change.Pass pair of1949-1952year Shangcheng county land reform in the rural social change survey, This paper argues that the Shangcheng county1949--1952years of land reform is characterized by (one) the county of land occupancy inspection, county land is highly concentrated in the hands of the landlord, kulak, in the agricultural land reform trend, after the completion of land and property still tend to equalization, middle peasant. Therefore in this article that the1949--1952county reform political than economic, social objective(two) in the treatment of kulak policy county is different from the other region and south. Central at that time advocate the real rich land, Central Bureau of the view moves rented out by the rich peasants to part, is the implementation of the " intermediate immobility, two equally " policy, county in the land reform in our treatment of the rich peasants land just half the landlord rented out by the rich peasants to type part, while adhering to the principles on the basis of a fine tuning.(three) County1949--1952 years of land reform in three stages on the basis of policies vary, so the reform of uneven level and thoroughly.This paper argues that the initial state in the state power as the backing and under the guidance of the county’s land reform, to force the external force deep into all aspects of the country, in the rapidly changing rural society at the same time, this forced the inertia forces did not stop, or go strict institutionalized, standardized, and there was no timely this period of political legacy for reflection, and miss the time history. At the same time, the theory construction and the people’s practical level also exist difference, which to a certain extent tension and deviation, also based on the national political consideration of class division into every social member fixed political identity and symbols, social strata curing make partial person has always been a political pressure under, for social liberation and development can play a positive role in promoting. So in the social revolution and change at the same time, we should correctly handle the " inside" and " outside"," top " and "bottom" relationship.