Font Size: a A A

Comparison Of Japan,China,Korea Quantifier

Posted on:2014-03-25Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W Y LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2255330401460498Subject:Japanese Language and Literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the countries of China, Japan and Korea,The quantifierof‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、’(?)(gae)’Are the most widely use and highest usage rate. According to previous researches,we can know that the outstanding things of researchers is the comparison of contrastive researches.of‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’in that sino-Japan and sino-Korea,They did not specify which nouns can combinewith‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、’(?)(gae)’;how to display synactic function when‘個(ko)/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’combines with other parts of speech;what’s more, what are the correspondencesof‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’.So,this paper aims to fill in the planks so that it can make up for the inadequacy of this aspect.In the contrastive researches of個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’.I hope to know universalities and particularities among‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’tofind characteristics so that we can better and more accurate get hold of their use range, meaning characters and application.There are three parts in my paper.First of all,I want to investigate the significance and the use scope of’個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’.Which are the necessary background introduction to understand the main part. Secondly,to expound the use of‘個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘个(ge)’、‘(?)(gae)’.In common relationgships and syntactic functions. In the respect of the perspective of relationships,’个(ge)’is more abundant than’個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’、‘(?)(gae)’; In the respect of the point of syntactic function,the basic word order is SOV in Japan and Korea,but have it is SOV in China.So,the syntax function is different between them.Finally,in Japanese,the’個(ko)’/‘つ(tu)’is given priority.Partly compare it with the‘个(ge)’in Chinese and the’(?)(gae)’in Korean.And I found there are3correspondences:One is completely corresponding; The other one is completely not corresponding;Another is not fully correspond to.
Keywords/Search Tags:quantifiers of China, Japan and Korea, Syntactic functions, A total ofrelationships, Corresponding relation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items