Sun Zhongshan Concept Of Asia Compare With An Jung-Geun East Asia Peace Theory

Sun Zhongshan in the long-term revolutionary struggle of practice, with the struggle against the changing situation at home and abroad, and gradually form the Asian’Concept." An Jung-geun in Harbin Railway Station killed the first of any system monitoring of Japan in Korea Ito Hirobumi and in1909, wrote a theory of peace in East Asia and in the lvshun prison before execution. An Jung-geun andSun Zhongshan two to China and South Korea’s fight for national independence and liberation struggle life, two outstanding figures of modern East Asian national independence movement has made a significant contribution. Sun Zhongshan Asian’ Concept and theory of peace in East Asia, Ahn has a representative in the concept of peace in modern East Asian countries. Reflects the modern East Asian countries to the pursuit of independence and peace of thought.First, Sun Zhongshan concept of Asia and An Jung-geun east Asia peace theory in the political, ideological and cultural thought the same point. Both political advocate of the Asian national unity and struggle, criticism of Japan’s aggression in other East Asian countries to jointly safeguard peace and stability in Asia. Ideologically, to inherit and carry forward the traditional Asian culture, to promote the moral struggle, the spirit of dedication. Both as a modern concept of peace in East Asia, the theory of the concept of peace in East Asia, East Asia has an important historical significance。Secondly, Sun Zhongshan concept of Asia and An Jung-geun east Asia peace theoryin the political, ideological and cultural thinking of different points. Politically and ideologically, the two differences in the way the concept of race to achieve peace in East Asia. Culture and ideology, both in the ideological foundation for the maintenance of peace, the Confucian peace ideologically different point of view. Understanding of both the historical influence on the time and scope of the difference through a comparative analysis of the difference of the two was more comprehensive understanding of the modern concept of peace in East Asia. Two each are formed out of their modern political complex, critical juncture of the nation from peril. The background of their own life, their education and life experiences and other factors, their concept of peace and therefore there are similarities and differences. Through a comparative analysis discusses the various factors that affect the ideological formation background. From thinking of SunZhongshan concept of Asia and An Jung-geun east Asia peace theoryon thinking from the traditional Asian concept of order, Confucianism culture, modern Western democra.