Revealing And Clncealing Of Conscious World And Text World

In20th Century of the literary theory steering process, most of the literary theory history are focused on the structuralism criticism that get into the text by symbol or code. They often neglected the other way called consciousness criticism, experience, intuition and consciousness were their path to get into text. In fact, structuralism and consciousness criticism all faced to the same object. They tried to eliminate other interference factors beyond the text and explored the scientific path into the text, which was the same. They were not the surface to see give tit for tat.Geneva school was the representative of the consciousness criticism. The critics of Geneva school learned from Husserl and Bergson, and in the hybrid effect of the contemporary ideological trend, showing an extraordinary criticism type. Geneva critics thought that literature was a kind of consciousness of human beings, literary criticism was about aware of consciousness. In order to keep the eagerly of passion, the critics expensed of analyse mentally, brought the fresh breath to the heavy criticism in20th Century with rich humanity. In their specific practice of criticism, critics canceled themselves’thoughts by l’ identification, unified the Conscious World and Text World by intentionality, seeking to the Empirical Mode that made the subject consciousness comprehensive, revealing a personalized world to the readers they cover by language and structure.Geneva school stand out a important position of consciousness in the Text, as a enlightening role for opening up the build high forts and dig deep ditches between the Language theory, Semiotics and Phenomenology. But we should also know that Geneva school also has shortcomings:they devoted a lot of energy to the Conscious World, made a consciousness cage for themselves and cannot move towards to reality.