Font Size: a A A

Criticism History Discussion On The Said Problem Of "Qu Song"

Posted on:2014-12-28Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y C FanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2255330401982390Subject:Ancient Chinese literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This paper studies on the two great poets Qu Yuan and Song Yu from Chu in the lateWarring States Period, the thesis focuses on "Qu Song" said in the history of literature.Presently, this thesis has no monograph on publish.This paper will open up study on "QuSong"said from the point of criticism of history, and will start from the Western Han Dynastywhen there were related history materials handed down about Qu Yuan and Song Yu,up tonowadays twenty-first century when the new period of research and development on Qu Yuanand Song Yu. This paper widely collects evidence data and endeavors to restore historicaltruth, works at an objective and scientific academic status for literature position relationshipbetween Qu Yuan and Song Yu.This paper processes discussion in four chapters. The first chapter is an introduction,mainly sets forth the origin and characteristic of Qu, Song briefly, briefly describes thehistory general situation of Qu、Song evaluation,clearly confirms the meaning and methodsof "Qu Song" said. The second chapter, the main body of this thesis, is criticism historyrestore of "Qu Song" said problem, follows the track of history, from explore Qu Yuanand Song Yu literature status relationship in Han-Wei-Jin dynasties, detailed discussion andcriticism of all of the information of Qu, Song, complete the restore of Qu, Song criticismhistory. The third chapter "is academic arguments of ’Qu Song’ said", the deepen part of thisthesis. Previous chapter of detailed data to support, to discuss Song Yu literary achievementsas the focus, clear hierarchy of Qu Yuan, Song Yu fully expounds the original contribution ofSong Yu in the literary creation of literature and finally just come to the conclusion: admiralliterature "Qu Song" said is correct and reasonable, with Qu Yuan and Song Yu iswell-deserved. The fourth chapter is "tortuous development and reawakening of Qu、Songcriticism since twenty century". Commends on developing situation of modern Qu、Songcriticism, analysis on presently acceptability of "Qu Song" said by educational circles. Thispart should have connected with first part, then to highlight the study development andachieved fruit of Qu、Song in the new time, and to raise thought and suggestion well versed innature with conclusion, so build this special chapter to expound.Accordingly, conclusion created as, since "Qu Song" said first mentioned in Liu Xie’s"Wen Xin Diao Long", is extremely scientific and correct:1. Qu、Song were all Chu peoplein the late of Warring States Period, they lived in close time background;2. Qu、Song allcreated famous prose poems that passed down;3. Qu、Song have pioneered the developmentof ancient Chinese literary work, Qu Yuan found The Songs of Chu, and Song Yu started theessay Fu;4. Qu、Song’s literary creation have made a profound influence on later generations.There is no second person could be found in Chinese literature history that much bettersuitable for Qu Yuan be equally famous except Song Yu, if only compete from the point ofliterature achievement.
Keywords/Search Tags:Qu Yuan, Song Yu, Said the Problem, History of Criticism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items