The Rhetoric Of Literary Experience In Michel Foucault’s Writings

Michel Foucault is a scholar who has a multiple identities, but its controversial landmark academic. Compared with the study of his philosophy of mainstream academic content, explore the text focused on the domain that is the use of Foucault’s ideas literary experience and Foucault experienced literary style expression. Whether it is the use of a large number of literary experience Foucault’s literary style or expression of experience, have a unique academic research value, and which generates the charming style experience with his literary character and literary texts. This article explained his writing as a full literary experience and individual (experience) narrative "Foucault" style.Breaking through the existing paradigm case of Foucault, this paper cut ideas on Foucault’s disciplinary relevance of the text and its literary experience involved between discourse from the perspective of rhetoric and hermeneutics. Foucault has a unique perspective in the relationship between words and things, and also attention to the language of expression and rhetoric, used in a large number of literary experience writing and literary discourse is derived from his continued focus on individual experience of the world, recording and interpretation of the impulse. As can be seen from the few literary criticism of his monograph "Raymond· Russell" in his life are deeply influenced by the French poet, writer, and put a "game" attitude and the way into writing, this full of humanism "game" in the sense expressed the importance of his experience in the use of literature, that will not be arrested in the fixed correspondence between words and objects, extend infinity rhetoric of openness and tension and integration. The thesis concluded the use of literary experience and literary discourse in Foucault’s writing as two genre and four category, it also combined with a large number of text that are discussed: The first category is the expression of literary experience, it contains three aspects--Clever use of metaphorical rhetoric; Re-interpretation of the text of the novel and drama characters; Thinking of painting theme exposition. The second category is the literary expression of personal style "experience" that individuals experience under microscopic narrative experience. These literary experience and literary discourse resulting in the formation of a conscious process of Foucault’s writing, therc is a correspondence with their own experience of the world’s perception, which resulting in a more real, more in-depth "voice" for Foucault’s theory of ideas.In the end, this paper summarizes by "Body of Life and Death" and "power game" thinking system and discusses the basic problem throughout Foucault’s work:"What are words and objects." In contemplation of genealogy and archeology analysis, the symbol of the supremacy of the privilege should be abolished, so that a return to the language itself. This requires experience of literary discourse to re-build, through elaborate on the use of narrative and individual experience across a variety of stylistic rhetoric, prompting a new language in order to respond to the demands of society face: In the diagnosis and reflection on the existing social system and structure, open the potentials which are the criticism of the social power and construct the knowledge system; reform ideas and concept innovation by experience in literature discourse and allusions to express. From the perspective of research in literary experience and literary discourse generation of thinkers Foucault’s writing, to restore the initial connection between ideological concepts and experience the world, as well as for current research of humanities have a methodological value.