Thoughs Concerning The Performance Of J.S.Bach’s Keyboard Music

In this thesis, basic on historical performance theory, I will discuss several practicalissues that may be concerned by scholars. I will probe into the feasibility and significance ofhistorical performance with collating the knowledge that have learnt.Today, the authorities never got a common sense to a "final version ". So, I think, evenUrtext Version doesn’t mean while the autograph from J.S.Bach but just a comparativelyacceptable one.For J.S.Bach’s music, the reflections straightly from Baroque architecture are much weakerthan indirectly with other methods.What you read on the score is the composer want to tell, besides is the composer consideredyou should known.It’s no need to feel perplexed by the many indeterminately factors, regard them as variablepossibilities, many different options that practicable, and rightfully. In a word, there will be nopuzzle if we do not negate other right things with one right.Playing with single note maybe correspond to the "autograph ", but the way Busoni do,reinforce the bass with octave, fits the author’s idea. which is better? The answer is clearly.Because the auditory aesthetical value is much more important than the meaning of the historicalfact to the score. And the meaning of carrying forward the auditory beauty is more signally.First creations and second creations should be neck to neck, in the creation of art, to themeaning of aesthetical value, they should run together. So, it’s no need to focus on the idea ofcomposer Bach, we may should pay more attention to what harpsichordist Bach though, that willmore helpful to understanding and playing his works.