The "Unfilial Crime" Of The Tang Code And Its Evolution

In this paper, it stars from the origins of filial sin to analysis the Tang Code filial sin source. Analysis of the specific terms of the lack of filial piety sin. Based in a the Tang Code filial sin to analysis of filial sin in Song, Ming and Qing Dynasty and in The late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China.The first part of the article is mainly to write the specific provisions of the lack of filial piety and the source of the crime in the the Tang Code filial sin. Felony Ten filial piety filial ethics from the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Northern Qi Dynasty law legal concepts, as well as the lack of filial piety crimes in the Tang law formally established, and a brief analysis of the specific terms of the Tang law crime of filial.The second part of the article written filial crimes specified in "Song Criminal""Great Ming Code" and "Qing Law", and to compared the subtle changes with the Tang Code.The third part of the article written crime of filial concrete manifestation of the loss and its evolution in the Modification of Laws Later Qing Dynasty.. Filial sin as a traditional criminal law offenses during this period is lossde, but the maintenance of the traditional filial piety to be prescribed a variety of ways through the civil and criminal law.The fourth part of the article wrote the reflection of penalties filial behavior and maintenance of traditional filial piety of the early Republic of the traditional in the law. Though comparison with the end of the Qing Dynasty, the maintenance of traditional filial piety tend to be more conservative, and described the reasons this period.The fifth part of the article analyzes the reasons of traditional filial crime from generation to change to the loss.The change of filial crime is to adapt to the inevitable result of historical development.