Construction Of Personal Danger Evaluation System On Adult Prisoners

This study based on the previous studies, Select the prisoners as subjects, serving dynamic compilation of personal danger human factors assessment questionnaire, trying to study the dynamic risk inmates factor structure, In order to provide a tool for measuring the risk of inmates dynamic people, combined with the static factors of risk assessment tools, to build a comprehensive evaluation system of the prison staff personal danger, in order to achieve hierarchical management of the offender. Firstly, related research at home and abroad, using a structured interview and open questionnaire survey to collect data, in the collection of the original information, a preliminary questionnaire content analysis, dynamic risk we proposed factors questionnaire assessment; secondly, questionnaire were used to collect data and prediction of initial, exploratory analysis factors, carries on the investigation to the revised questionnaire again, the data by confirmatory factor analysis, the formal questionnaire, the reliability and validity of various statistics and variables; finally, through the experiment on the formation of the prison staff personal danger evaluation system of test results.The main results obtained are as follows:(1) Dynamic risk prisoners human factors is a multi-dimensional structure, including the social consciousness, social support status, prison adaptation, neuroticism dimension four. Among them, anti-social consciousness includes four projects; social support status includes three projects; imprisonment adaptation includes five projects; neuroticism included five items.(2) Through the questionnaire reliability and validity analysis shows that, the dynamic risk the prisoners human factors assessment questionnaire, reliability, validity. Description of measurement tools the questionnaire can be regarded as dynamic risk prisoners human factors evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis results of fit indices:x2/df=3.48shows good model can accept; NNFI, NFI, CFI, GFI, IFI are greater than0.90, and nearly1; RMR=0.054, show that the fitting is very good; RMSEA=0.065between0.05-0.08belongs to is consistent, In general these indicators are in line with the requirements, which shows that the model fitted well. Internal consistency coefficient of four dimensions of personal danger evaluation factors of dynamic prisoners who are between0.721-0.869,0.911is the coefficient of total questionnaire internal consistency; physical danger factor dynamic prisoners evaluation four dimensions of half of the coefficient between0.641-0.848, of which the total questionnaire split-half coefficient0.820. can see the questionnaire has good stability, reliability.(3) Evaluation in the statistical variable to explore the differences found physical danger factor dynamic prisoners people:one is the support condition, different cultural levels of prisoners in prison to adapt to the situation of social dimensions there are significant differences, and differences In antisocial consciousness dimension also reached the edge significantly; two is in the social consciousness, imprisonment to adapt to the situation, dimensions of social support, there are significant differences between different crime number of prisoners; three different age classes of prisoners to exist significant differences in dimensions and total questionnaire on social consciousness, imprisonment.