Network Effects Of Public Opinion On The Administration Of Justice

As an important part of the overall public opinion, public opinion has become a network to be reckoned gradually demonstrating the irreplaceable social role.Network mode of transmission has become a public expression of public opinion, the discussion of public affairs, to participate in economic, social and political life and the importance of public opinion to the platform, a series of cases, and network media directly related can happen especially in recent years show that public opinion on the network decisions affect the judicial process is gradually increased.Network media to let the public network as the carrier has been an unprecedented release of its diversity, complexity and real-time features to allow users to fully and timely opinions expressed. Justice is the application of law in the form of state power by solving activities in the field of social disputes, is the ultimate way to remedy the most thorough social conflict. Judicial pursuit of justice in law, the network of public opinion on the ethical pursuit of justice, both in the pursuit of the ultimate value of unity in social justice. However, due to the randomness of the network, the purpose is not strong, it often appeared emotional public opinion, influence the course of justice.Contradictions network of public opinion and judicial opinion is a legal practitioner logical network adhering to logic and justice uphold the public there is a deviation in many ways. The purpose is to give jurisdiction exists to provide individuals who suffer an authoritative relief, while the network of public opinion on behalf of a civil consciousness is largely his own preferences and one-sided view of the opinion added. Today’s society, in any case both are highly concerned about social conflicts and contradictions in contemporary society has universal significance, it is the extreme manifestation of conflict of interest and values the relationship between the various sectors of the population. Judge seeks judgment to reflect the will of the people, the judges need to continue to play its role in the conversion, the implementation of its open character traits. Short-term build-up on the network raging opinion, judges inevitably affected.Route network of public opinion and judicial decisions consensus: public access to the legitimacy of judicial decisions is the social psychological basis. During the trial should be fully listen to public opinion, the verdict will be more widely accepted. In the Internet era, the trial can promote open and transparent public confidence in the judicial decision, to gradually improve the diversity of the program to make the trial open to meet the needs of public participation in the trial. Meanwhile, over in public opinion as the standard of judicial decisions, the decision will be lost in the process of being kidnapped and objective opinion, there can be no talk of justice. Justice should be carried out independently by law. under the watchful eye of the people, is respect for the law...