Research On The Pension Insurance System Reform Of Institutions

Institutions is carrying the main carrier of the government’s public service, its operatingefficiency affect impact on people’s happiness index directly and related to the construction process of thepublic service-oriented government. Pension insurance system reform can be implemented smoothly, itsrelated to the quality and operating efficiency of the public services provided by institutions directly.Institutions Pension system reform is not simply Pension insurance system reform, but closely associatedwith the huge project of institutions reform, it can not be successful without the top-level design and systempromote from institutions. How to respond to the needs of the community, for the fiscal burdens, promotethe institutions pension insurance system reform, is still a difficult problem to test the wisdom of centraland local government, as well as urgent academia crack and answered a challenge. So investigate theinstitutions pension insurance system reform has important theoretical and practical significance.Rawls’ Theory of Justice, Pareto improvement theory, institutional change and path dependencytheory, All of them has provided sufficient theoretical basis and useful revelation for institutions pensioninsurance system reform.Since2008, government has carry out reform work in pilot provinces and cities,there are Shanxi, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Chongqing. But from the reform and advancing thesituation, reform progress has been slow, has not really started, and is still in the research programs anddemonstration phase. In contrast with the slowly reform, institutions staffing management, incomedistribution system reform, Construction of legal governance, classification reform of public institutionsand so on has made progress in pilot provinces and cities. All the work has Played a certain role inpromoting the institutions pension system reform.The institutions pension insurance system reform has sparked widespread controversy, mainlyconcentrated in three areas: A. Whether the reform can alleviate the financial burden; B. Whether thereform can promote social equity; C. Whether the reform can enhance efficiency of resource allocation ofpension insurance. Institutions pension reform encountered a lot of resistance and difficulties in pilotprovinces and cities, the deep-seated reasons are: Boycotted by Committing vested interests; the reformpilot provinces widespread "free-rider" psychological in pilot provinces and cities; Uncertainty andinstitutional path dependence bring greater resistance and matching system is imperfect.To promote the institutions pension system reform, constituted by the "three pillars" pensioninsurance system should be established. To strengthen the top-level design of reform and improve therelevant laws and regulations; To improve relevant supporting policies and promote synergy with thevarious reforms in the institutions; gradually establishing personal accounts, make good transfer andcontinuation pension insurance work.