Organizational Intentional Forgetting And Technology Innovation Effectiveness

With the continuous development of economy, the enterprise faces increasing competition between enterprises face a more volatile external environment, enterprises need to do technology innovation constantly, to meet the needs of consumers change, so that they can take over the favourable position in market competition. In the dynamic environment, for carrying on effective technology innovation, enterprises should change the existing knowledge, mental models action inertia and so on. Based on this, some western scholars put forward the content of the organizational unlearning, In the process of organizational innovation research, some scholars pay more and more attention to organizational forgetting, and proposed organization unlearning actively to innovation. This is because organizational intentional forgetting can effective forget obsolete knowledge, mental models action inertia and so on, to better absorb new knowledge and technology, develop better habits and values, so that enterprises can adapt to the new development demand. However, the development of enterprises are affected by the external environment, the environment of the instability has a certain guiding role for the organization intentional forgetting, Based on this, this article research organization actively forget influence on technology innovation, volatility based on environmental regulation, for many of the problems in current enterprise have certain reference significance.On the basis of this, this study first for defining the concept, and the concept of division, according to certain dimensions for, summarized the relationship between the three variables, and thus put forward the organization actively forget and the assumption of technology innovation, and explored the relation between environmental volatility in both its regulatory role, on this basis, the related theory model is set up and then, in this paper, reference to related scale, form the questionnaire, by adopting the combination of online survey and field survey approach to data collectionuse the large sample survey method for data collection and the SPSS19.0pair for data analysis, eventually come to the following conclusions:Organizational intentional forgetting for incremental innovations have significant impact, while radical innovation has a significant impact. The effect of Organizational intentional forgetting for breakthrough has more significant impact than incremental innovation. Specific represented as, Organizational concept of forgetting for incremental innovation has no significant effect, organization practices of forgetting for incremental innovation have a significant impact, and organization of concept and practices of forgetting for breakthrough innovation has a significant effect, Organizations intentional forgetting more can promote the organization to Radical innovation. Our research indicate that Organizational intentional forgetting is an important element for technology innovation. In the process of technology innovation. It is necessary for the enterprise to change the knowledge structure, mode of thinking and behavior to absorb the deeper knowledge and build more good habits and adapt to new mode of thinking, in order to promote technological innovation. Meanwhile, more aggressive initiative to take Organizational intentional forgetting can promote radical innovation, enables organizations to create new competitive advantages to become the industry leader.Environmental turbulence plays a regulatory factor in Organizational intentional forgetting and radical vs. incremental innovation. Though the Organizational intentional forgetting plays a positive role in radical vs. incremental innovation, however, in practice, the Organizational intentional forgetting dosen’t play a positive role. This may be affected by the manager, company culture and environment change. From the environmental perspective, this article observes the environmental turbulence’s regulatory role in the relationship of incremental innovation and breakthrough innovation. The results show that different environments have different effects on Organizational intentional forgetting, and thus on the two technologies innovation model. Technology turbulence have significant negative regulation for the relationship between organization concept forgetting and Radical innovation, and have significant positive relationship for the relationship between practices forgetting and incremental innovation, but market turbulence have significant positive relationship for concept forgetting and incremental innovation. This can be summed up as, the activities of the organization initiative forgetting, can make the incremental technology innovation, and avoid a radical innovation in the enterprise at the environment of market and technology turbulent. This is associated with the current development status of China’s market economy, Enterprise technical innovation requires a lot of money demand, The enterprise financing scale have relationship with the scale of the enterprise and profitability indicators, Large enterprises occupy most of the interests of the market, can easily get a lot of money, in order to maintain the interests of the market, will continue to improve for the products, but this improvement is only for the improvement of products and services, and will not risk to product innovation creates, damage the interests of the current. When a business choose breakthrough innovation, they should input a lot of human, physical and financial resources. In order to obtain competitive advantage, more and more new type enterprises will choose to break through innovation. But the current Chinese market, financing and investment markets are not perfect, most of the capital projects in pursuit of short-term interests such as large amounts of capital into the real estate market, as a result, most of new enterprises can not effectively, To stay in the market, you first need to resolve the dilemma of capital, and then you can spend a lot of manpower and money for technical innovation. This to a certain extent, inhibit new enterprises breakthrough innovation.