Font Size: a A A

Function Analysis Of PGRP-LB And PGRP-SB In Immunity Andmodulation Of Intestinal Microbiota In Bactrocera Dorsalis

Posted on:2016-12-25Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:A L WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2283330461496129Subject:Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis(Hendel), is one of the most important agricultural pests because the larvae stay inside the fruits and can harm a wide range of fruits and vegetables. Gut microbes are closely related to the insect itself. They affect many physiological functions of the hosts such as metabolism, immunity, etc. Using RT-PCR and RACE, we have cloned genes PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB. We have performed analyses of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB functions by infecting with Escherichia coli before or after RNAi. We also analyzed the changes of commensal bacteria flora in the gut after the genes PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB were silienced by using RNAi, in order to explore the role of these genes in maintaining the intestinal microflora homeostasis of B.dorsalis and provide a new target and strategy for control of B.dorsalis.1 Gene cloning and expression pattern of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SBThe length of the nucleic acid sequence of the ORF of the PGRP-LB we’ve got from NCBI was 738 bp. We have cloned PGRP-SB, the length of the nucleic acid sequence of the ORF was 558 bp. Sequence analyses indicated that the homology of each gene is 86% and 91% between B.dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata. The expression patterns indicated that the PGRP-LB highly expressed in the midgut of the adult; the PGRP-SB highly expressed in the third larva and fatbody of the adult.2 The immune responses of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB to opportunistic pathogensThe immune responses of B. dorsalis after infection with E. coli showed that the expression levels of Diptericin, PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB raised significantly. The maximum up-regulation of Diptericin is 6.40 times at 6h after systemic infection and 4.52 times at 12 h after orval infection. The maximum up-regulation of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB after systemic infection is 2.97 times at 6h and 1.61 times at 24 h. The maximum up-regulation of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB after orval infection is 54.32% at 12h and 30.26% at 12 h. But the immune response for systemic infection was much stronger than oral infection. These results indictated that bacteria E. coli can leads to a systemic and local immune response. Besides the antibacterial peptide gene Diptericin and genes PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB play important roles in the process of intestinal defense.3 The effect of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB on immune responses of B.dorsalisWe analysed the functions of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB to immune responses of B. dorsalis by infection with E. coli after RNAi. We found that PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB-RNAi flies had stronger and more sustained immune responses than wild-type flies, as measured by the expression of the antibacterial peptide gene Diptericin. These results revealed that PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB could prevent immune activation of B.dorsalis, and acted as negative regulators of the Imd pathway.4 The effect of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB on the intestinal microbial community composition and structure of B.dorsalisTo confirm the role of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB in regμLation of commensal bacteria flora in the gut, we next detected the microflora variation in the gut between the control and PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB-RNAi flies. q RT-PCR showed that the expression levels of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB reduced significantly within 5 days after RNAi and returned to normal at 15 days. Moreover, the quantity of gut bacteria has changed a lot. The number of total bacteria, γ-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes downregμ Lated 18.78%, 56.67%, 61.98% and 67.46% respectively at 5 days after silencing PGRP-LB gene. The number of total bacteria, α-Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes down-reg μ Lated 31.73%, 40.41%, 44.64%, 50.26%, 52.19% and 0.18% respectively at 5 days after silencing PGRP-SB gene. The total bacteria, α-Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes up-regμ Lated 2.16 times, 1.04 times, 1.65 times, 0.38 times, 2.70 times and 0.84 times respectively at 15 days after silencing PGRP-LB gene.The α-Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria up-regμ Lated 53.77% and 60.48% and the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes downed-regulated 14.89% and 63.60% at 15 days after silencing PGRP-SB gene. All bacteria have no significant difference from the control at 20 dyas after silencing PGRP-LB or PGRP-SB gene, except that the total bacteria and γ-Proteobacteria from down-regulated 45.96% and 62.06% after silencing PGRP-LB gene. These reluts confirmed that the silence of PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB lead to changes of the intestinal microflora. PGRP-LB and PGRP-SB play an indispensable role in maintaining the intestinal microflora homeostasis of B.dorsalis.
Keywords/Search Tags:Bactrocera dorsalis, Insect immunity, PGRP, Intestinal microbiota
PDF Full Text Request
Related items