Guo Xiang’s ’Zhuangzi Notes’ And Cheng Xuanying’s ’Zhuangzi Commentaries’ Of Zhuangzi Interpret Differences And Their Root Causes

"Zhuangzi" also known as "South scriptures", written by the midWarring States thinker Zhuang Zhou and his disciples and followers, divided into theinner,outerand miscellaneous chapters. The history of individual parties "Zhuangzi"had different interpretations, according to Guo Qingfan of the Qing Dynasty compiledby "Zhuangzi" written for dibon, choose Jin Guo Xiang’s "Zhuangzi notes"and ChengXuanying of the Tang Dynasty’s "Zhuangzi commentaries", both for Zhuangzi tojudge and transformation, forming a unique style of interpretation.He is one of the representative figures of metaphysics in Wei and Jin Dynasties,"Zhuangzi notes" from worship, purpose is to refute the society at that time to the"no" for honour and cause excessive vanity and empty; and the early Cheng Xuanyingis a Taoist priest, the emperor to he very learned, fine channel,Buddhist classics, rackone’s brains thirty years of writing was "Zhuangzi commentaries",referencingBuddhist Madhyamika thoughts, still intends to restructure theoriginal taoism. GuoXiang’s "Zhuangzi notes" and Cheng Xuanying’s "Zhuangzi commentaries"can besaid to be the product of the times, two subjects were tested with different aspects ofthe interpretation of the "Zhuangzi" one book, through reinterpretation of theirdifferent ideas. From two individuals, we saw more than reproduction of "Zhuangzi",behind the times but notes, it is "the note I". From this perspective, he and ChengXuanying is not only the interpretation of"Zhuangzi" to "Zhuangzi", but notes to a"restore order" of the objective.This paper attempts to sort out the Guo, two people the inheritance andtransformation of "Zhuangzi", showing a difference of "Zhuangzi" and the original,this difference is studied in this paper, because of the existence of"difference", it canbe more profound perception in different times, different identity, differentbackground for the same a book "Zhuangzi" and the influence of the reason for thedifference, through the text search to create the.The process to generate any thought is not a single force, but a variety of forces "together" results, this paper starts from theanalysis, trying to expand the field of vision, the diversification of research.