Ownership Thought Of Philosophy Analysis On "German Ideology"

“Ownership” is not only an important part of the theory of historical materialism of Marx,but also a hot issue at home and abroad in recent years."The German Ideology"(hereinafterreferred to as "Form") is an iconic work of historical materialism of Marx’s. In the "form",Marx focuses on the “Ownership ideas”. Then in "The Poverty of Philosophy","TheCommunist Manifesto" and other writings, he had done a thorough exposition. In the "Form",the Marxist science reveals the productive forces and production relations, the dialecticalrelationship between the economic base and the superstructure. Marx revealed the inner logicand evolution of social and historical development about the proposition of “Ownership”,development and prediction of its future. The scientific theory continues to be confirmedthrough socialist revolutions and socialist construction practices.This paper focused on using the viewpoint and method of dialectical materialism andhistorical materialism to analyze the "form" in the issue of “Ownership”.“Ownership” seemsto belong to the general category of research in the field of economics, while it contains a richphilosophical thought. This paper attempted to examine the philosophical perspective of the"Form" in the “Ownership of ideas” through the writing background of Marxist theory and itsposition in the system. The formation of “Ownership” has a particular historical background.As the ownership of ideological materialism, it plays an important role and significance in the"Form". The development and the formation of Marx’s thought is a result of his deepunderstanding of the reality. The development of “Ownership” and the realistic factors areclosely related. It has a direct origin with the distribution and division of labors. Thedevelopment of “Ownership” is a gradual process. The research and criticism from thephysical to the metaphysical form is also a historic process. In the "Form", Marx divided thehistorical classification of “Ownership” into four aspects according to the priority of theirappearance. In essence,“Ownership” is divided into private part and public part. In themeanwhile, the countries and the laws are closely linked with “Ownership”. The emergencyof countries is the result of the development of “Ownership”. To protect the benefit of“Ownership”, it needs law.“Ownership” is not the final result of private ownership. Classcontradictions were growing through the development of private ownership. The eliminationof private ownership and alienated labors are the trends of social reality. The end of thecountries and private ownership is the final stage of the movement of “Ownership”. The trulycomprehensive development of freedom can be achieved through destroying people’s privateproperty alienation to arrive to the communist society.