The Analyse Of The Monk And The Taoist Of “Three Volumes Of Words” And “Two Volumes Of Slapping”

The monk and the Taoist is the special exist of “Three Volumes of Words” and “Two Volumes of Slapping”, and they play a decisive role in the cosmetic urge. Through the Statistical number of the monk and Taoist, we find that there are 68 monks and 57 Taoists in total. The monk in 5 novels and the Taoist in 8 novels are the main character of Three Volumes of Words, The monk in 6 novels and the Taoist in 3 novels are the main character of Two Volumes of Slapping. Whatever the number or the role in the article space, the monk and Taoist both take an important position.They are not only the embodiment of the traditional sense of justice and good, but also some of them become more and more greed and wickedness.Compared with Three Volumes of Words,there are some differences between The monk and the Taoist in Two Volumes of Slapping. The monk and the Taoist in Two Volumes of Slapping is more secular,The immortal Taoist in Three Volumes of Words become more "humanized" in Two Volumes of Slapping. And their experience become normal from legendary. The reason that the monk and the Taoist in “Three Volumes of Words”“Two Volumes of Slapping” become secularization and socialization is diverse. The ruler’s attitude of the Ming dynasty had a direct impact on the monk and the Taoist, The development of commodity economy of Ming developed the perception of the monk and the Taoist to pursuit money and beauty. The thought of Wang Yangming’s heart- mind theory and the thought of Li Zhi’s nature’s theory played great influence on people of Ming Dynasty. Finally, the rise of popular literature make the figure of “Three Volumes of Words”“Two Volumes of Slapping” had the brand of popularization and secular.The monk and the Taoist Figure in “Three Volumes of Words”“Two Volumes of Slapping” is closely connected with the long history of Buddhism and Taoism culture in our country. Religious culture and society customary both had a great influence on the monk and the Taoist. Because of the difference experience of the two author of the two works,and the figures they created also have some differences. Feng Menglong prefer to condemn the religious evil, at the same time, he also maintained the religious’ s orthodoxy. The author Ling Mengchu not only condemn the religious evil, but also have a uncertain attitude with the sexual promiscuity of the monk and the Taoist. Ling hate the defiance of the monk and the Taoist, too.