Research On The Questionnaire And Current Situation Of Moral Values Of Senior High School Students

Moral values is the individual to judge whether the internal standards of ethical, affect in dividual behaviors and ways of thinking.As an important component values, more and more attention to sociologists, political scientists and psychologists.Groups of high school students is the key to individual thought and moral forming stages, physiological and physical maturity, making them more independence, but a lack of rational judgment, easy to get lost.How to help high school students establish positive moral values, towards the right path educators are faced with major issues.According to this study, Li Hong(1994) three dimensional orientation structure of moral values, made in accordance with the characteristics of high school students moral values survey and questionnaire investigation and analysis on current situation of senior high school students ’ moral values, analysis of underlying causes and to propose appropriate measures, study reached the following conclusions:(1)According to Li Hong(1994) the moral values proposed structure is divided into "personal-social orientation" and "positive-negative orientation", "enterprising-coordinate orientation of" three point values.Through empirical studies made of the moral values survey of high school students, this questionnaire have good reliability and validity, internal consistency coefficient 0.8 through project analysis and factor analysis a total of 50 items,includes 6 dimensions: altruism, collectivism, social ethics, innovation, harmony, personal virtue.(2)High school students ’ moral values in the medium-high level, all dimensions of moral values from high to low as follows: personal virtue, creativity, harmony, collectivism, social morality and altruism.(3)Outside of public morality was not significant, grade on high school students ’ moral values, there is significant difference in other dimensions. Dimensions of altruism, sophomore score is greater than junior,and senior;Dimensions of collectivism, sophomore scores were significantly higher than junior,and senior, and increased with grade lower;In the social dimension, does not exist significant differences at all levels, but senior scores for socialmorality than the other two grades;There are significant differences in ethics and personal dimension, increased with grade, scores also increased;On the innovation dimension and sophomore score is greater than senior, the lowest score is junior;in a harmonious dimension,with additional individual pay more attention to personal, social coherence and others.(4)High school students ’ moral values, there are certain differences in the professional direction. Arts and Sciences social and innovative dimensions differ, and no significant differences in other dimensions.(5)Only-child and child with siblings in altruism,collectivism, personal virtue and innovative dimension there is a significant difference in social ethics and harmonious dimensions are not significant.child with siblings relative to the one-child collectivism and altruism on average score higher, innovative higher scores than child with siblings and an only child.(6)In addition to the harmonious dimensions, other dimensions of moral values differ in the family registration.In altruism, collectivism, city students scored significantly lower than that of rural students.Personal virtues and scores of innovative urban than rural students, and reached a significant level. On the harmonious dimensions in both urban and rural students were not significant.