Chinese And Korean Woed Contrast Spatial Dimensions

Spatial dimensional adjectives are words that describe the amount of space occupied by an object or other part of a certain shape, whic h plays an indispensable role in the life of Chinese and Korean langua ge. In this paper, on the basis of previous research, in modern Chines e "深/浅" and Korean "(?)" as the object of study and comparat ive analysis. The few studies of antonyms in Chinese and Korean, but a lso less comparative research on this two pairs of antonyms. Based on the previous studies, this paper uses three plane theory and cognitive linguistics to explore the three aspects of semantics, syntax and pra gmatics. Compare to "深/浅" and "(?)" basic meaning and metaph orical meaning, examines in detail the collocation features and syntac tic features of "深/浅 and "(?)". Also from the emotional co lor, frequency of use, the use of asymmetry on the three aspects of th e use of Chinese and Korean with different points. Because of the diff erent cultural background, cognitive model and language structure, the two languages show the similarities and differences in their performa nce.This paper is divided into five parts.The first part is the introduction. In the introduction part, the research object and content, research purpose and significance, resea rch ideas and methods, related research status, the source of the corp us are briefly described.The second part is the semantic part. The main aspects of the sem antics of Chinese "深/浅" and Korean "(?)" the basic meaning and metaphor for example analysis.The third part is the syntactic part. Syntactic aspects mainly on Chinese "深/浅" and Korean "(?)" collocation features and synta ctic features, for example analysis.The fourth part is the pragmatic part. Pragmatics mainly emotiona 1 color of Chinese "深/浅" and Korean "(?)", use frequency of us e, the asymmetry of three aspects inspects the Chinese and Korean with different points of.The fifth part is the conclusion. In this paper, the content and point of view are summarized, and pointed out the inadequacies of the paper and the direction of future efforts.