On The Index System Of University Admission

It is not difficult to find a variety of college admissions in the field of educationalinequality is the result of the uneven distribution of resources in some areas of concentrationand enrollment targets, and therefore calls for a more "equal" distribution. As everyone knows,in the beginning of the establishment of the system to run the process, formulation andimplementation of policies, not the "equality" as a major factor to consider, because they needto consider other more and more important factors, such as finance college from localgovernment, should give care in the index distribution. This system claims to restrictuniversity admissions index number of factors are able to defend the rationality of the system?Can become a target allocation college admissions "difficulties"?Previous studies ignore the value of this important institutional research, no index-depthanalysis of the system itself, the author of this article on the study among tries to give ananswer to these questions. This paper is divided into four parts, of which the first chapter isthe introduction, the main issue is raised, the other three parts unfold along the followingmain ideas.The second chapter, along the historical evolution of university admissions index systemof university admissions index system has deep historical roots, has gone from the CentralSoviet Area as an indicator as to give the object, and now as a standard geographicalindicators quota admissions As the system has to change,"the purpose of admission" andcontinue to make adjustments. While this indicator system and the same strain of thetop-down nature of the administrative system of education combined.Standardize basic indicators of university admissions system, and draw influenceuniversity admissions index distribution of three factors, namely, financial factors, personnelfactors, the university self-interest considerations. Under the triple factors, college admissionsprocess inevitably tends to local candidates and candidates in economically developed areas.Thus the main factors come "equality" is not the college admissions process underconsideration.Measure whether these factors need standards as a reason to defend the rationality of thesystem, and the rights of Dworkin’s theory proposed a good solution to this problem, namely the right attitude seriously. The refinement of the theory of the right to judicial practice stillrequires specific criteria to treat specific rights, the paper summarizes the benchmark test forcollege admissions in Dworkin’s theory of rights is linked to the practice field a meaningfulattempt.