The Evolution Logic And Contemporary Value Of Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory

Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory in the formation, development process,resulted in two kinds of logic. The realities logic is that the reality and history ofdevelopment progress track of Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory. The possiblelogic namely those who had the right of Mao Zedong, reflecting a certain regularity,has also been recognized by the then leader of the Party Central Committee, and in themodern era part of the " reproduction " of a variety of reasons not implemented at thetime the new democratic ideas of possible evolution trajectories. I want in this articlestudied Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory, is unlike Mao Zedong Thought sense ofdemocracy theory. Instead, Mao himself theory of New Democracy, I believe that fromthe perspective of denotation, the New Democracy theory of Mao Zedong Thought isnot exactly the same sense of the New Democracy. The author in this paper focusesdistinction between democracy theory and the Mao Zedong’s New Democracy. I believethat, from Marxism in China’s development process and the experience can be summedup: the theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics originated in the NewDemocracy theory, between them is the same strain relationship is advancing with thetimes. Socialism with Chinese characteristics theory as a theory of Mao Zedong’s NewDemocracy “negation of negation " phase of the higher level of "Return." We must putMao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory of Marxism in China’s development process toexamine and interpret in order to better grasp the essence of this theory and value.This paper aims to study the evolution Logic and Contemporary Value of MaoZedong’s New Democracy Theory. Not just on the value of Mao Zedong in terms ofdemocracy theory itself. Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory of the formationprocess is the process of Marxism in China. However, in this process the formation ofMao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory, is not all theory of Marxism in China’sachievements that Chinese Marxism. Among them, the right ideas belong to MaoZedong Thought is a Chinese-style Marxism. Wherein said non-scientific orideological limitations, can only be regarded Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory.However, regardless of its scientific nature, or limitations, are the sums of our preciouswealth today, having extraordinary value?Democracy theory is the essence of Mao Zedong Thought, is Mao Zedong at thecore of the first generation of central collective leadership with the basic principles of Marxism with the20th century, Chinese special conditions combine to achieve thetheory of Marxism in China one of the outcomes. The first generation of collectiveleadership of the " how to economically and culturally backward old China to carry outdemocratic revolution, after the victory of the revolution to establish what kind ofsociety, and how in the semi-feudal society, based on the establishment of an inevitabletransition to socialism social." issues such as the exploration of theory and practice, andultimately the formation of a scientific theory of New Democracy. It is the collectivewisdom of the Chinese Communists. Under the guidance of this theory, our Party ledthe people to complete the democratic revolution, the establishment of a democraticnature of the new China, and realized the transition from New Democracy to socialism.Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory is the new democratic revolution,democratic society and the transition from New Democracy to socialism theory. MaoZedong’s theory of New Democratic Revolution Party Central Committee and otherleaders of the time is the same. However, Mao Zedong democratic social constructiontheory and the transition from New Democracy to socialism theory, in the year1925have undergone great changes. This change mainly reflected in: Mao outset that, afterthe victory of the democratic revolution, democratic society to undergo long-termconstruction until certain conditions has to transition to socialism. But by the end of1952, Mao Zedong gradually changed the laws of social development that meet thescientific theory. Transitional line is good evidence. Transitional line proposedestablishment of new China to basic completion of socialist transformation is atransitional period. This shows that this time is no longer speaking to go through Mao ’slong-term democratic after construction until the conditions are ripe for furthertransition to socialism; Instead, the new China was established we entered a transitionalperiod. This is actually in line with Mao on his original scientific laws of socialdevelopment of the theory of democratic significant “correction." Since then, MaoZedong Thought and the New Democratic Theory Liu Shaoqi, who was a seriousdisagreement, he also Liu Shaoqi, who proposed the idea of consolidating the newdemocratic order has been criticized. It has also become serious differences within theparty, and the subsequent emergence of Mao Zedong ’left ’ error is one of the importantreasons.This paper will dialectical and historical materialism as a guide, based on objectivefacts, to illustrate the scientific connotation of Mao Zedong’s New Democracy Theory,the theory of evolution from this theory of the evolution of both logic, illustrate the practice of this theory effects and scientific nature of this theory has been seriouslymodified reasons And draw historical contribution of this theory and historicallimitations, summarize both positive and negative lessons learned, and thus reveal thecontemporary value of this theory.