The Justice Democratization Of Theory Describes And The Path Of Choice

Whether in the objective reality or in legal research, the democratization of Justice asan important part of judicial reform has been a major concern.Democratization of relationsjudicial justice and democratic theory has been the focus of debate, the simple theory ofthe two are far apart, but the combination of China’s political system will find justice anddemocracy very close contact.Today the world is no longer of democracy and justice inthe continuing leave to judicial reform, and gradually establish a system of two linked.Inthe course of our ongoing judicial reform, we need to seriously think about thedevelopment of the theory and practice of judicial democratization in China. This article isstarting from a problem, the status quo of China’s judicial theory and democratization ofjudicial democratization analyzed to find me suitable for justice from the path ofdemocratization of development. The process of judicial reform constantly engaged in, theproblems faced is endless, and we have to do is to reform the judicial process ofdemocratization in theory give more support.The first part is related to the concept of judicial democratization theory an overview.There is a general democratization of the judiciary and the integrity of the cognitive, talkabout the concept of justice in this part of the main analysis of democratization, and thedifference between the concepts of democratic legitimacy and justice. For judicialdemocratization in theory and practice to make some of their own ideas defectsThe second part is the democratization of justice in the history of the development ofChina made a brief overview, which describes the existence of judicial rationality ofdemocratization in our country from a historical perspective.The third part of the main advantage of the method of comparative analysis, theUnited States and Japan by introducing concrete manifestation of democratic justicesystem, and each of the two systems were analyzed, summed up the jury for our peopleand the people’s supervisor reference.The fourth part is the focus of this discussion, this section is a path through thedemocratization of judicial supervision of prosecutorial power in the people’s supervisorsystem to analyze this choice, first introduced in the United States and France supervisionof prosecutorial power mode, followed by, analyzes the supervision of prosecutorialpower mode, the last one describes the new system of supervision of prosecutorial power-the people’s supervisor system, in order to prove that the people of our judicialdemocratization path selection is correct.