Analysis The Legal Nature Of The Academic Degree Evaluation Committee Of Ordinary University

As an institution to award degree, the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee playsan important role in the university. With the development of the knowledge economy andthe optimization of University’s internal govemance structure, it is required that the legalnature and authority of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee should keep pacewith the development of the society, however, since the legal nature of the AcademicDegree Evaluation Committee on laws and regulations, implementation and judicialpractice in colleges is not clear. In practice, awarding the degree through an academicassessment is under the administrative leadership, which triggers many problems. So, it isvery urgent to clear the legal nature of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee. Theauthor hopes she can compare three patterns’ advantages and disadvantages of legalnature of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee in foreign, and analyzes thereferrnce for value, thus provide the basise and system design for the academic andadministrative position of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee. The thesis canbe divided into five parts:The introduction part gives us the base case of the Academic Degree EvaluationCommittee. The author analyzes that position the Academic Degree EvaluationCommittee is meaningful for clear the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee’s statusand authority\solve the question of degree standard in degree granting lawsuit and ensurethe academic and administrative power balance, then summary introduces the literaturesand considers they are less, and that scholars have differents points, points out thatanalysize this question is necessary, the thesis writing is accoring to put forward thequestion—solve the questionThe first part, this part mainly expounds the meaning the Academic DegreeEvaluation Committee and related concepts. Degree is the supporting documents ofacademic ability,it’s nature is academic evaluation, right of Degree-conferring isadministrative power, the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee is an internalinstitution, it’s legal nature is mainly points the right of Degree-conferring isadministrative or academic; the purpose of exercising authority, the Academic DegreeEvaluation Committee confers degree’s nature; and this institution is independent\internalor a decision\execution institution.The second chapter is about the current situation and question of the legal nature of the academic degree evaluation committee. This part from China’s current laws andregulations, colleges and universities and judicial practice fix the Academic DegreeEvaluation Committee, and put forward the problems include locating is fuzzy, theresponsibilities are unclear among the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee andAcademic Council and the Dissertation Committee and lack of effective supervision.The third chapter rmainly understands three patterns of overseas legal nature of theAcademic Degree Evaluation Institution(academic pattern, represented by theUS\administrative pattern, represented by the Russia\academic and administrativepattern, represented by the UK), compares the advantages and disadvantages of threemodels and the line into reason and condition, then analysizes three patterns’ referencevalue in responsibilities\formation\the purpose of degree grating.The fourth chapter, this is the article’s centre, mainly analyzes the theoretical basisand practical basis to fix the legal nature of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committeeas academic and administrative dual nature, from establish a complete, scientific andreasonable system of legal norms of degree,clearly put forward the legal nature,responsibilities and work procedures of the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee, toclarify the relationship among the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee,the AcademicCommittee and the Dissertation Committee, gradually establish and improve theAcademic Committee as the core of the university academic management system,set up aspecial supervision organization and follow three principles in juridical practice, thosefive terms qualitative the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee as an academic andadministrative institution.