Qualitative Study On Intentional Inflicting Of Harm Behavior At Others’ Instigation

In the theory of criminal law in our country, the criminal liability of joint crime and joint crime is more difficult, in the judicial practice difficult problem relatively. Henan city in the Ji Moumou directs others to implement intentional injury case involves the theoretical issues related to the common intentional injury. In this paper, such as the common intentional injury case, the principal of the crime of instigator, and in-depth analysis of common crime, compared with other easily confused. Combined with the case materials, the statement and the testimony of witnesses, from the objective reality, analysis of common crime, subjective elements, objective elements of crime, the results for the analysis of this case, the common intentional injury case cognizance; criminal responsibility of joint intentional crime cognizance, believes the case the court found for Ji Moumou crime of harboring unreasonable. Ji Moumou should not be identified as the crime of harboring and other criminal acts, should constitute common crime of intentional injury.The first part of the thesis statement of the facts of the case, to find out the focus of controversy in the case of three. The second part of the paper is the analysis of the focus of controversy: firstly discusses the qualitative problems of the crime of harboring a criminal; then introduced the criminal law on the accomplice instigator of accountability; finally elaborated that the principal issues in criminal law. The third part is the conclusion of the case study: the case of the defendant Ji Moumou constitute the crime of harboring; in this case the defendant Ji Moumou and other defendants constitute the crime of intentional injury; in this case the defendant Ji Moumou defendant to other crime, whether it should be identified as the culprit.