Research On The Impact Of Netwok Opinion On Judicial Trial In New Media Environment

The rise of the Internet to people’s lives, adding a new environment, fast and convenient has made it without it, the network affect all aspects of people’s lives network. The network of public opinion is the new thing in the network background, people in real time over the network can effectively express their wishes and ideas, so the "netizens" change quietly rising, people on the network use is not limited to entertainment and leisure has gradually involved in news and reviews of national policy, of course, justice has become one of the focus of the network of public opinion. As a safeguard judicial justice of the last line of defense, its citizens are more concerned about the development trend, coupled with such cases tend to have a high public value, so much attention.Network public opinion is a "double-edged sword," both positive and negative side, the positive effects are: the rapid popularity of the network to bring the convenience, more and more citizens to join, good network public opinion in favor of the realization of justice. Advantages of the network of public opinion in its news media to break the traditional drawbacks and limitations, can be real-time, without status limit personal remarks published, reveal the inner voice. Although the public can freely speech, but this speech is not arbitrary, but should be regulated by law, not wanton, vicious speech, it will affect the public opinion and judicial impartiality and independence. Judicial independence and impartiality of the process of the trial emphasized, without interference by any person other than the law of things, can only judge the law, the exercise of social responsibility network of public opinion, supervise the judicial process in the trial if there is capricious and arbitrary phenomenon. Negative effects are: because the network of its advantages, it spread quickly and has a strong timeliness, media and individual Internet users doping personal opinions and emotions in the communication process, views and opinions expressed do not necessarily comply with legal matters and cases progress Such an unreasonable interference judicial easy network media impartiality and independence. Network media "hype" case phenomenon frequently, affecting the normal to hear the case, increasing the pressure on the judges of the trial, by the media to win the sympathy of the public know the truth, forced by public opinion, the trial judge in the case to the public sometimes tilt the view, so that indirectly affect the outcome of the trial of the case, so that the course of justice in terms of form, or in essence, are subject to varying degrees. Due to people’s understanding of the legal and judicial process is still relatively small, processes and procedures for the administration of justice is not necessarily able to get the majority of citizens recognized by the justice of the law as the yardstick to judge, follow the justice, of course, respect for ethics. However, the heart of the public and judicial ethics standards may not be exactly the same ethical standards. Network public opinion on justice played a positive role, it can real-time coverage of their trial, and truthful information to the public through its dissemination to understand the real information, network monitoring can monitor whether the judiciary during the trial impartial administration of justice, if strictly according to law, if there is capricious and arbitrary phenomenon. Judicial officers in the course of adjudicating cases, a network can not be affected by public opinion, blindly cater to "public opinion", the so-called "public opinion" should be a true reflection of the objective facts, the public generally true thoughts, rather than individual media and individuals out fraud. Therefore, monitoring the network of public opinion is a double edged sword, while the law perfect boosters, may also interfere with the judicial side, "a drag."This paper studies the relationship between the four parts of the network through the media and the administration of justice, including an overview of network media and justice, public opinion on the need for judicial supervision of the network, the network impact of public opinion on the administration of justice, justice network media environment authority shall recommend the trial of four parts. The main purpose is to promote the role of the network to improve public opinion of the administration of justice, the network public opinion monitoring mechanism is a broad participation of citizens, as when the judiciary can not escape with the Dodgers, should actively respond and cope with, the current of public opinion were positive guidance, supervision and accusations without fear of public opinion, so that the public can be the most direct understanding of the current state of the judiciary, so that the "double-edged sword," only play a positive role.