People’s Assessors’ Participation In Trial Whose Amateurism, Non-specialization Characteristics And Application Security

The jury system is one kind of important judicial systems which have A long history, wide range of implementation and can reflect democratic value orientation in many countries in the world. In recent years, our people’s jury system corresponding to the idea of democracy and the mass line concept, vigorously pursued in the judicial practice, has made many achievements.However, in the process of implementing the system of people’s assessors, due to the people’s Court of the parties involved in the work of selecting and appointing leading, there are significant deficiencies, not only caused a negative evaluation of the social from all walks of life, but also reduces the actual effect of the people’s jury trial initiative and trial work.The people’s jury as non professionals to participate in the trial, with the difference between the innate and the professional judges, only to face these differences, in order to avoid weaknesses, play to people’s assessors from the masses, but also easy to win the trust of the masses of the natural advantage.However, the current system of people’s jurors ignored the differences in security procedures, role orientation, function division, the people’s assessors and judges confused, so that the people’s jury is non specialized, non occupation characteristics become the factors restricting the implementation of the system, it is difficult to give full play to the case in the trial jury, also hindered the healthy development of the work of people’s assessors of china.Therefore, in the new situation at present in our country to strengthen the work of people’s assessors, only from the two aspects of theory and practice, according to the people’s jury trial value,function,feature of objective analysis, positioning, from a representative role specialization division of functions and responsibilities,differentiation program security disciplinary accountability etc to improve the people’s jury due to the common services in the judicial career, a good situation and common commitment to the construction of socialist rule of law.