Research The Online Open System Of Administrative Judgment

Administrative judgment is the final carrier of the court trial of administrative cases, is an important manifestation of the judicial process and the results of the judiciary. Administrative judgment of the Internet is an important part of China’s judicial openness, but also an important part of the judicial credibility. Under the background of the current judicial reform in full swing forward, in-depth study of China ’s administrative verdict open system of regulations and practice of Internet, and put forward to reform initiatives undoubtedly has important theoretical significance and far-reaching practical value.Administrative judgment on the Internet has played an important role in the open trial. The positive attitude of all levels of the national court in administrative judgment on the Internet in public works reflects the change of the idea of judicial reform in our country. Open, fair trial and sunshine justice has become the conscious pursuit of judicial activities in the new era. Administrative verdict online publicity system reflects the judicial activity in China, new initiatives in the information age, is open justice, judicial transparency new expectations and new demands, which can meet the public demand for judicial information, is conducive to curb corruption in the judiciary, is conducive to the realization of justice, is conducive to strengthening legal advocacy, is conducive to the prosperity of academic research.With the increase of judicial reform, under the guidance of the theory of the new judicial reform, the public system of administrative judgment has attracted wide attention. The rapid development of the information age of the Internet has brought convenience to the informatization construction of the people’s courts at all levels, the people’s court shall fully understand the particularity of "Internet plus" era, strengthening the information construction of the court, enhancing judicial and social communication, and providing more convenience litigation services, public Internet which cannot do without administrative the verdict. The introduction of the new administrative litigation law in China and the continuous deepening of the rule of law, it provides a good legal environment and the real soil for the improvement of the system of the Internet public judgment.This paper examines the administrative verdict Internet open the theoretical foundation and realistic meaning of administrative judgment online open system status, status of the practice and its shortcomings, and then in the comparison of the United States, South Korea and China’s Hong Kong and Taiwan region judgment Internet disclosure practices based on the proposed systematic comprehensive improvement suggestions. These suggestions include: one is to strengthen the relevant supporting mechanism and responsibility mechanism; the second is to strengthen the normative public Internet access, balance the privacy of the parties right and citizen’s right to know the relationship between; the third is to provide personalized service and build interactive mechanism; four is to perfect the relief procedure, combining the implementation of reward and punishment mechanism, the establishment of Internet open and other open at the same time, there are a variety of open mechanism. This article believes that the improvement of the public system of administrative judgment is a long-term process, and the relevant legislation needs to be amended to conform to the development of the times.