| The article is according to comparison study between America and China in development view on current situation of theory,law and practice,mainly the whole comparison study of Work-related Injury range between United States and China from dimension of its people right, damage extent, standard scope and exclusion range, etc. meanwhile,use fact to expound Work-related Injury case those are controversial such as "whether the wound in welfare activities that enterprise endows is Work-related Injury ""whether the wound at staffs life place the same as work place,personal VS work, who are on business is Work-related Injury"and refer related items in American law to analyze and compare,properly utility,expound ideas in two keys,the first, theory range of identification of Chinese Work-related Injury and legalization in practice is in disadvantage of protecting legal right of Chinese laborers versus America, the second,the identification standard of new Work-related Injury cases those are the same kinds but different judgment.Study to come up with optimized proposal about Work-related Injury identification with comparison, properly to lead ideology and thought of "double purpose rules" 〠"special mission rules"ã€"unreasonable risky rules", so as to improve controversial cases during Work-related Injury identification, present definite measure and proposal to strengthen law and rule optimizing Work-related Injury identification standard,to ensure legal rights of employee and employer. Make Work-related Injury get compensation, Make non-Work-related Injury belong to clearly, in order to get other compensation way. |