| With the rapid development of Chinese economy and society, the urbanization process is propelled continuously and national life quality has been promoted obviously. However, a series of problems also come along with development. At present, the society is operating in spite of illness and social contradictions become increasingly prominent, presenting characteristics of low ignition point, high boiling point, multiple contractors, multiformity of subjects, interdisciplinary and cross-territory contradictions and so on. The report from the18 th CPC National Congress pointed out that “In the 30 years after the Reform and Opening-up Policy, Chinese economy has realized the high rate of growth of annual 9% and has become the 2nd largest economy in the world. However, economic development has led to increasingly higher resource and environment cost as well as the continuously expanding gap between the rich and the poor and urban-rural gapâ€. “Currently, the increase of various conflicts and contradictions is still the severe deficiency in Chinese development processâ€.At present, under the pressure-style maintaining stability system, basic-level governments are driven by assessments. Major party leaders have paid more attention than ever before to solution of social contradictions. They have been investing safeguard stability cost and increasing resolving forces. To some extent, they have played positive roles in social contradiction resolving. However, there are also a series of problems, such as difficult operation of checking and resolving mechanism, increasingly intense right-protection ways of people and new challenges brought by new areas of social contradictions and so on.This paper adopts documentary method, empirical approach, conclusion and analysis and other social sciences research methods and on the basis of profound investigation of resolving situation of social contradictions in Haizhu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, it combines the investigation results with foreign and domestic theories and practices, analyzing the dilemma of basic-level governments under the pressure-style maintaining stability system and proposing better means and methods to resolve social contradictions. The thesis is composed of four chapters:Chapter one is introduction, which mainly introduces research background, research significance, foreign and domestic research situation, major research content, conceptorganization and theories and so on.Chapter two is status analysis of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system. By analyzing types of social contradictions, the generation of the pressure-style maintaining stability system and measures of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system, it analyzes problems of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system from five perspectives, which are operating dilemma, game dilemma, methods dilemma, closure dilemma and field dilemma.Chapter three is reason survey of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system and it surveys from inside and outside perspectives. Inside reasons include assessment criterion, leaders’ instruction, settling conditions, warning mechanism, primary-level organization and so on;outside reasons include policies and regulations, social participation, following suit effects and intervention of external forces and so on.Chapter four is countermeasures and suggestions of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system. It starts from five layers according to the above reason analysis, which are system, policy, mechanism,organization and environment, and it proposes countermeasures and suggestions of basic-level governments resolving social contradictions under the pressure-style maintaining stability system. |