An Evaluation And Analysis On Post-feminism Jurisprudence

In the 20th century is the century of women, women’s political, economic and social status has been greatly improved, the equality between men and women has also been established in law in almost all the countries in the world. However, gender prejudge is not allowed according to the law, but it exists everywhere in reality, and still deeply engraved in people’s mind. Post-feminism intends to eliminate potential gender discrimination from the culture and ideology by its subversion, and to explore the new way leading to women’s liberation. Guiding by post-feminist theory, studying in the field of law research, is the post-feminism jurisprudence, the center of attention in this paper.This paper is organized by a line of what-why-evaluation, which means introduces the origin and development of post-feminism jurisprudence-the critiques to the traditional feminism legal theory-the evaluation of post-feminism jurisprudence itself. This paper is divided into four chapters altogether. The first chapter is the introduction of post-feminism jurisprudence-about its theory origin, realistic background and representative thought. A brief introduction to the basic proposition of postmodern theory, the relationship between postmodernism and post-feminism, the relationship between post-feminism and post-feminism jurisprudence. Set the definition of the post-feminism jurisprudence and its extension. The second chapter starts from the post-feminism theory, focusing on the criticism to traditional feminism of four aspects and the basic proposition of post-feminism jurisprudence theory. The third chapter tries to integrate the post-feminism theory scattered in the literature on gender justice, and emphatically analyzed post-feminism theory about sex. Due to the particularity of postmodern theory, the post-feminism point out the problems in traditional feminism theory and critique on them. Post-feminism puts forward solutions and at the same time, itself also creates new problems. The fourth chapter is the criticism and evaluation about the post-feminism jurisprudence itself.