Present Form Of Content Standards Of "Chemistry And Sustainable Development" In The Chemistry Textbooks Of High School

With the development of chemical science, more and more new materials and chemical products are entering our daily life, which has brought great convenience to our society. However, our environment being destroyed by the inaccurate use and over-exploitation of resources, so the strategy of “Sustainable Development” is born. Meanwhile, under the “wave” of the implementation of the new curriculum concept, chemical education combines the “Sustainable Development” with its subject characteristics firstly. What?s more, chemical education leads it into the chemistry curriculum standard which is called “Chemical and Sustainable Development”(Theme 3 of Chemistry 2). At the same time, education department advocates writing multiple versions of the course book for educators to choose the proper book which based on the different places and teaching contents. As we all know that different course books have their unique features in this curriculum content, such as the knowledge capacity of chapters, the novelty of figures, the arrangement of tasks and the usage of knowledge points could influence the course book?s rendering effect. So how the different versions of the course book present this theme of curriculum standard? Which version of the course book content can reflect this part of knowledge better? These two questions are paid much attention by the textbook editors and perplexing the majority of front-line educators. However, domestic researches on this theme of curriculum standard are not too many. In this research, the author analyzed the content standard of the chemical curriculum standard in detail, and then made a detailed comparison of the introductions, contents, texts; exercises, tasks, charts; notes, appendices, indexes and other parts of the People?s Education Press?s Chemistry 1(compulsory) 、 Chemistry 2(compulsory), Jiangsu Education Publishing House?s Chemistry 1(compulsory)、Chemistry 2(compulsory),and Shandong Science and Technology Publishing House?s Chemistry 1(compulsory)、Chemistry 2(compulsory), and at last, summed up the data and drew the following conclusions:1.In the aspect of presenting content standards, the content standards 1,2,4,5,6 are presented more complete and better in People?s Education Press?s course book and the processing effect of content standards 3 of Shandong Publication?s course book is more prominent, but none of the three versions course book presenting the use of “non-phosphate detergent” of content standard 5. The cognitive learning objectives of chapters and knowledge points? layout of People?s Education Press is processed better, on the contract, there are much knowledge points are arranged in the same chapter in the layout of content standards of Jiangsu Publication and Shandong Publication, also the knowledge points are made up too scattered in the content standards 5 and 6.2. In the aspect of using other teaching material elements, the chart use effect of course book of Shandong Publication is most efficient, the second is People?s Education Publication and the last one is Jiangsu Publication; on column setup, the column design of People?s Education Press is the most reasonable, however, the number of column setup of Shandong Publication is one of the most and innovative, Jiangsu Publication is not too much in this aspect;in the ease of use and interesting aspect, Shandong Publication has the complete indexing and interesting pictures so the presenting effect is outstanding, next one is Jiangsu Publication, but People?s Education Press don?t use the indexing function.