On Theindustrial Injury Insurancepayments In The Definition Of "Co-ordinating"

Work injury insurance claims in cases of labor disputes occupy a large proportion of our country, because the standard of compensation differences and work injury insurance dispute between workers and employers a lot to form the dispute. After April27,2003People’s Republic of China State Council promulgated the "Work Injury Insurance Regulations," worker request compensation for injuries, at61, paragraph3of the Ordinance when calculating the amount of his salary to the city to determine the co-ordination of co-ordination unit regional average wage for the amount of the average wage of workers in the area regularly published. Article XI December20,2010revised after the "Work Injury Insurance Regulations":"work injury insurance fund gradually implemented at the provincial level." Then Gansu Provincial People’s Government on February24,2012announced the "Gansu Province<injury Insurance Regulations "means" the way Article IV states:"The work injury insurance fund to the provincial co-ordination" in this province, some courts in determining the overall regional average wage of workers in the province as a co-ordinating regional units for the whole, the amount of the provincial average wage of workers. Thus the formation of a phenomenon:the high standard of living after some municipal areas suitable for the newly revised "Work Injury Insurance Regulations", injured workers receive compensation but the amount has decreased over the past applied the old method. The result is:injured workers demands are not met, they think codefendant different sentence, undermine public confidence injustice and fairness. The core content of this article is the case encountered by judicial practice, to explore how to define work-related injury insurance claims in "co-ordinating" with a view of the case.after the trial and legislation play a facilitating role.The first chapter is a reference to the main content of a typical case of real labor dispute occurred, indicating problems in such disputes. The second chapter is the focus of controversy and the main content of the decision based on analysis of cases. The third chapter is a theoretical analysis of the contents of the case of the legal relationship. The fourth chapter is the main content of the legislative, judicial and put forward suggestions for cases.