The Analysis Of Chinas High-technology Industry International Specialization Status

Based on having so many problems that the evaluation of the status of international division of high technology industry in our country have limitations, without fully considering the intermediate input contains a large number of imports which would lead to overestimate the actual level of development of our high technology industry and the evaluation index of economic meaning is not clear. This paper tries to construct the new evaluation index, based on input-occupancy-output relations on a country’s high technology industry. The index can not only avoid the problems of the traditional index like overvalued, unclear of the economic meaning and so on, and moreover it can accurate measure the real development level of a country’s high technology industry.In this paper, the high-technology industry is separated from the other industries and we set up the non-competitive input-occupancy-output model including four major industries to calculate the domestic value-added and domestic employment added, then advance the index of “Fully Comparative Productivity ”in order to estimate the China‘s international specialization status. Taking the calculated result of high technology industry ‘fully comparative productivity’ about eighteen countries from1995 to 2007 and Chinese from1995 to 2011 as a sample, we can use it for international comparison, industry comparison, dynamic comparison to make a conclusion and find the dynamic characteristics.Through analysis and comparison, we can draw the following conclusions:First, through fully comparative of the labor productivity, the pattern of the international division of the world high technology industry became polarization, just the developed countries in which the status of the division of labor has changed, However, the developing country such as the Czech Republic, China is developing rapidly but far away from the developed countries.Second, through the comparison of 18 countries, the development of high technology industry in Belgium has been a world leader, and it is in stark contrast with Japan which is only country that appears a downward trend. The surface reason is due to the very low Human input in Belgium and the influence of the recession economy background of Japan, but investigate its deep-seated reason is related to the investment type of a country’s high technology industry which provides reference significance to the future development of high technology industry in our country.Third, although the completely comparative labor productivity of China’s high technology industry increases rapidly, the position of the international division of labor did not get promoted. It is worth noting that the gap between China and developed countries is not narrow but appeared the trend of widening, although the rapid development of high technology industry in our country.Fourth, the development of high technology industry in China has exceeded the traditional industry, and driving effects on service industry is effective, which is the same as the developed countries. The completely comparative labor productivity of China’s high technology industry has been rising obviously between 1995 to 2007, it does not change due to the international financial crisis, but presents a strong rise, which suggests that China has less dependence on the international market, and the ability to resist financial crisis is increasing.