Comparative Study On Real Estate Evaluation Method

Since the reform and opening up, China’s real estate industry has gradually become the basic industry of national economy and pillar industry. Real estate is not only a kind of important resources or property, but also a commodity or asset, it become the main object of people to trade and investment. Social and economic activities related to real estate transactions, mortgages, mortgages, taxes, insurance, compensation, corporate management, bankruptcy,liquidation, restructuring and real estate development, government macroeconomic regulation and so on, all need professional staff to assess and judge the value of real estate prices, that is, real estate assessment.At present, China’s real estate assessment methods are mainly comparative method, income method, cost method, the three common evaluation methods, the three methods are different, the theoretical basis of different. In the actual assessment process, these three methods all have some shortcomings and problems because of their own defects, which is not conducive to improving the accuracy of real estate assessment, damage to the interests of the parties concerned.In this paper, based on the theory of the three assessment methods, combined with the author’s ten years of assessment work experience, pointed out that the real estate assessment of the three methods in the practical application of many problems, The main reason is too much dependence on the subjective experience of the assessment division and the current real estate market development in our country is not perfect, This is largely affected by the fairness of the assessment results, In view of this kind of problem in three kinds of assessment methods in the specific performance, The application of Delphy method, fuzzy mathematics membership degree and closeness degree, the market extraction method, the typical investment income model, the cost method, the supply and demand adjustment coefficient are proposed, In order to reduce the error of the results of the assessment, the assessment results more in line with market rules.