On The "Consensus Of Value" From The Perspective Of Historical Materialism

The value is the philosophical problem that people must face and think in the practice of social production, so that it is the important part of philosophical basic theory."Value" is not a low-level, general, individualized problem in philosophy, but a high-level, deep-seated problem that is widely questioned by philosophers. Especially in the international environment of economic globalization and civilization diversification,people respect the value of diversification at the same time, with the global problem highlights the increase in the main body in order to better meet each other's needs and maximize the benefits in the pursuit of Private development on the basis of more and more attention to the value of public issues of consensus. In theory, the problem of value consensus has always been a hidden dimension and subject in Marxist philosophical theory. At the international level, the pluralist questioned the question of value consistency mainly from the perspective of linguistic philosophy. In our country, the study of value consensus in the theory is mainly from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s,from the perspective of the value of ontology, into the mid-90s, then turned to the evaluation theory as the main line. However, most of the research in the past from the field of view, only limited to the relationship between the subject and object, the main point of view of the value of the emphasis on the value of diversity, differences, relative to the public value and value of the unity, Sex is not enough attention.In general, many scholars have explored different dimensions of value consensus from different horizons,but lacked the materialism from Marx's historical materialism,based on practical materialism, and replaced the tradition by "relational thinking" "The entity thinking", the existence of human society and human practice in the subjective rights and responsibilities, as the understanding of value phenomena and values of the objective basis, through the analysis of practice and subjectivity to systematically analyze and solve the relevant The value of the consensus of the various issues.On the basis of refuting the "universal value", based on Marx's practical materialism,from the perspective of historical materialism, why should we reject the "universal value"and pay attention to the "value consensus" and clarify the history of "value consensus"Sex and class nature, and why, whether it is "universal value" or "value consensus", are produced in the context of pluralism and competition with each other, and there is a question of whether it is legitimate or not, whether it is reasonable or not , The core standard of measurement should be the inevitability of social and historical development,and should not be the other. It is particularly noteworthy that they, as an ideology, change with the changes in the way of production and exchange of human material, and thus derive the theoretical and practical significance of constructing the "value consensus" in the context of value diversification.