On The Constitutional Obligations Of The State-owned Property

The property owned by the country or the government is of great significance or value of public property, and the most important tool for the performance. The constitution really thinks highly of the property owned by the country or the government, but after years of practice, neglect of the property owned by the country or the government also shall bear the incumbency and incumbency is of constitutional significance. Based on the study of the property owned by the country or the government,and property owned by the country or the government in China, together we can see other works on the property owned by the country or the government, whether it should be required, must do the work and the realize path of constitutional obligations are explored.This paper consists of the following parts:First of my paper, legal analysis of property owned by the country or the government. In my paper, the status of property owned by the country or the government has long been related about the property owned by the country or the government China language, this paper attempts to make it clear and known about the basic concepts of property owned by the country or the government, property owned by the country or the government, to a clear and well-known constitutional position.The standard of the property owned by the country or the government all over the world now differs by countries,countries like Germany and France,they intent to divide the property owned by the country as owned by the country for the public or for the country itself.In our country,we don't have a clear standard about it now,as far as I know,we intend to divide the property owned by the country or the government as the property used for business,the property used for public service,and the property contained in nature.The third part is to discuss what is the obligation of the property owned by the country or the government.First of all,the most important job of the property owned by the country or the government aims to strengthen our Socialist System,and it will always keep it not only in the begin of our country,but also during the construction of our country.Secondly,the property owned by the country or the government is the representative of the public good.We will talk about the property owned by the country or the government in laws and the constitution and the effective operational usage of the neglect of duty, causes the hand that the property owned by the country or the government as a part of public property enjoys high constitutional status, to the altar of the property owned by the country or the government is gradually empty. Second, the the property owned by the country or the government investment system, management, use, income is insufficient, the the property owned by the country or the government should not assume obligations and. Third, the protection of human rights to the property owned by the country or the government has the constitutional value of the practice of constitutional obligations in the specific provisions specified in the contents of human rights which is the property owned by the country or the government should play a role.The third part, realize the constitutional obligation of the property owned by the country or the government to the perfection of legal system to social reform efforts. First of all, a clear definition of public interest, the public interest is not only the Treasury's interests and public interests, must make the most benefit is not a specific person, at the same time, the government in the expropriation to exclude commercial interests. Secondly, to speed up the process of lawmaking of the property owned by the country or the government, many countries and regions have established a relatively perfect legal system of state-owned assets and the property owned by the country or the government in China, there is great progress of lawmaking in the field of space. Third, the concept of constructing the national and national public property and private property from the legal. This method can be integrated with our existing standards better, is conducive to the types and content of the constitutional obligation of the property owned by the country or the government.