Legal Study Of Information Disclosure System Of Public Enterprises Of China

With the rapid development of modern society and the expansion of the government authority and functions, the information which the government possesses has gradually increased. Public enterprises and institutions which undertake parts of the government public service function also hold a large amount of information. The information which is related to the realization of the interests of the public has the same transparency with the government information and has an inevitable trend of public service.Article 37 of Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information of China stipulates that public enterprises and institutions are the legal obligations of information disclosure. But the provisions are too general, and the provisions don't make detailed stipulation of the specific subject qualification, the scope of information, the mode of information publicity, the applicant's relief and other issues which results in making the law difficult to apply, guide and operate in the practice.From the detailed definition of the legislation on public enterprises and institutions in our country, the connotation and extension of public enterprises and public institutions.are defined in detail by summarizing the commonness and characteristics of public enterprises and public institutions. Through the introduction and analysis of public welfare, monopoly and regulation of public enterprises and institutions, this paper summarizes the purpose and significance of the development of public interests, and points out that the socialization of government authority and protection of the public right to know are the theoretical basis of public enterprises and institutions of information publicity.Due to the problems which the subject of information publicity in public enterprises and institutions in our country is unclear, the scope of information is not clear, the mode of information publicity is not specific and the way of relief is not smooth, this paper puts forward some suggestions with typical cases. This paper puts forward some suggestions:The definition of "closely related to the interests of the people" which acts as a criterion for judging the subject should be specific; the information classification of information content should be clarified to refine the scope and boundaries of the information publicity; The status of the main channels of the network public should be established and the "Internet +" mode of information publicity should be developed in order to save cost and improve the efficiency of information publicity; In view of the condition of the poor information publicity relief way, this paper introduces the relevant legislation and practical achievements and experiences of the United Kingdom and Japan and so on. In order to find a reasonable basis, this paper has made the discussion for the rationality of the additional institutions. Therefore, this paper proposes to follow other countries'achievements and experience to establish a special neutral information publicity authority to implement the related information consultation, guidance, supervision and relief in order to ensure the legitimacy and independence and improve the efficiency of information publicity.